Best Works of Art of All Time – The Critics’ Picks, Part 1

This is Part 1 of a meta-list of the most highly-regarded paintings, sculptures and various other works of visual art. For Part 2, go HERE. To create the list, I collected approximately 24 lists of “Best Works of Art” from websites and books and combined them into one list. This list contains the paintings and sculptures (and several pieces of decorative art) on four or more of the original source lists, organized by rank, that is, with the artworks that were on the most lists at the top. Part 1 begins with the artwork that was on the most lists (16 out of 24) and ends with the artworks that were on 6 lists.  Part 2 includes the works of art on 5 or 4 of the original source lists. The numbers in bold indicate the number of original source lists that contained that work of art.

Please note: This is a meta-list that combines multiple lists made by critics, academics and other experts.  These are not my personal opinions.

Each listing contains the following information: (1) artist(s) name(s) (if known), (2) artwork title (including alternative titles), (3) date(s) of creation, (4) dimensions of the work, (5) medium or materials used and (4) location where the original can be seen. I have also written a short essay for each artwork with additional information, which may include style, technique, interpretation, social and political context, provenance, and random trivia.

I have tried to provide one or more public domain images for all the artworks.  In most cases, you can click on the image to enlarge it.

Warning No. 1: Although I tried to find lists of the best art from all places and all times, most of the lists I found focused on the art of Western Civilization, and some of those lists focused almost exclusively on Western European and North American art. If I had room to publish every work of art on any of the lists, you would see more diversity, but less critical consensus on quality. Once I restrict the focus to works cited on three or more lists, the Western bias becomes quite plain. I have also published a five-part chronological list of works of art on two or more of the 18 “Best Art” lists, called Art History 101, which has a somewhat more worldly complexion, although Asia, Africa and South America are still seriously underrepresented.

Warning No. 2: The heavy emphasis on Western European artists working between 1300 and 1700 also means that many of the most highly regarded works contain Christian religious imagery. At that time, most people viewing the art would have been familiar with these stories and symbols, but today many folks trying to appreciate these works are not Christian, or may not otherwise be as familiar with Christian imagery as the average art-viewing European of that time. The same goes for the mythology of Greece, Rome and other cultures, which often provide the subject matter for works of art. Reading up on Christian religious images and Greco-Roman mythology may help to put the art in context.

Warning No. 3: Some of the images below portray the unclothed human form. I don’t think there is anything obscene about any of these images, but there is at least one statue of a naked man where you can clearly see his kibbles n’ bits, which some folks may find offensive.

Despite my concerns about diversity – religious, geographical, or otherwise – a quick look through this list leaves no doubt that, whether or not these are the “best works of art of all time”, as my title so confidently proclaims, they are all significant artistic achievements and worthy of your consideration.

For a chronologically-organized history of visual art that contains significantly more works of art (every work of art on 2 or more of the original 24 lists), check out the Art History 101 lists, starting HERE.

DON’T FORGET: IN MOST CASES, YOU CAN CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO ENLARGE THEM

On 16 “Best Art” Lists
Diego VelázquezLas Meninas (The Maids of Honor) (1656) Museo del Prado, Madrid


Las Meninas (The Maids of Honor) is famous for its ambiguous point of view, its snapshot-like reality, and the questions it raises about truth and illusion (see first image above).  At the apparent center of the painting stands the Infante Margaret Theresa, daughter of King Philip IV of Spain, attended by her entourage, but while the composition seems balanced, Velazquez has not established a central point toward which all the perspective lines converge. The king and queen are represented by their reflections in the mirror at the back of the room (see second image, above), implying that they are watching the scene, and that the painter has placed the royals in the same location as the viewers, giving us their perspective. Velázquez also painted himself standing before a large canvas at left, the tallest figure in the room. Las Meninas itself is large, measuring 10.4 ft. high by 9 ft. wide, and is now located at the Museo del Prado in Madrid. Random Trivia: The red cross of the Order of Santiago that Velázquez wears in Las Meninas was received long after the painting was finished, and was added by order of King Philip IV after the painter’s death.

On 15 “Best Art” Lists
Giotto (Giotto di Bondone): Frescoes, Scrovegni Chapel (Arena Chapel) (c. 1305)
Padua, Italy


 
Like most 14th Century Christians who loaned money in return for interest, Italian banker Enrico Scrovegni was concerned about his salvation. The Bible contained a proscription against usury, and for many centuries the only people willing (or allowed) to lend money were non-Christians. By the early 14th Century, Christians had begun to enter the banking business, but with anxiety. Years earlier, Dante had assigned Enrico Scrovegni’s father Reginaldo to the Seventh Circle of Hell in his Inferno as a punishment for his money lending ways.  When Enrico Scrovegni built a new family palace in Padua, he made sure that a private family chapel was attached. Because the chapel was built on the site of a former Roman arena, it is sometime referred to as the Arena Chapel. Scrovegni commissioned Proto-Renaissance Italian artist Giotto di Bondone (known as Giotto) to paint frescoes on the chapel walls. Giotto painted a series of 37 frescoes – most of them 6.5 feet square – on the chapel walls, finishing the project by the time of the chapel’s dedication on March 25, 1305.  Most of the frescoes depict scenes from the life of Christ and the life of Mary, with an immense fresco of the Last Judgment for the wall above the entrance, and various other images throughout the room (see third image above). The fresco technique requires the artist to mix pigments with wet plaster and work quickly on a section of wall before the plaster dries, and the borders of the sections are visible on each fresco. The Scrovegni Chapel frescoes mark the beginning of the new, humanistic style that would blossom in the Renaissance. Giotto is breaking away from the flat, stylized representations of Medieval and Gothic art by infusing the scenes with more emotional intensity, drawing figures with greater solidity, and constructing more naturalistic environments for the characters. In the Kiss of Judas (first image above), part of the Life of Christ cycle, Giotto presents not the kiss but the tense face-to-face confrontation between Jesus and Judas, while soldiers rush in and the apostles fight back in a frenzy of action. Giotto marshals every detail – lighting, expressions, gestures, even the folds of their clothes – to heighten the drama. The Last Judgment, on the west wall of the chapel and measuring 32.8 ft. tall by 27.6 ft. wide, depicts Jesus sitting in judgment over the souls of the saved and the damned. Although the chapel was privately-owned, the Scrovegnis allowed it to be used as a public worship space on certain occasions, such as the Feast of the Annunciation. It is clear that Scrovegni hoped that the chapel and its religious art would help him overcome the sin of usury and achieve salvation. To emphasize the point, Giotto painted a likeness of Enrico Scrovegni in The Last Judgment fresco, showing him offering a model of the chapel to the Virgin Mary.

Michelangelo (Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni): David (1501-1504)
Galleria dell’Accademia, Florence
  michelangelo david front
Michelangelo carved his 17-ft. tall marble statue of the Biblical hero David from a block of Carrara marble that other artists had abandoned. Instead of showing David with the dead Goliath, as was standard, Michelangelo has depicted the hero in the moment after he has decided to fight the giant but before the actual battle. The David was originally commissioned to be one of several statues on the roof of Florence’s cathedral, and this upward looking perspective may explain why the figure’s head and hands are oversized compared to the rest of the body. After Michelangelo completed the work, cathedral officials decided it would be impossible to raise the 6-ton statue to the roof, and decided to place it in the public square outside the Palazzo della Signoria, where it was unveiled in 1504.  In 1873, because of weather damage, the statue was moved to the Galleria dell’Accademia in Florence, where it remains (see two views of statue above).  In 1882, a replica was installed in the original location. In 1991, a man smuggled a hammer into the museum and used it to destroy part of the David’s left foot, which was later restored.

Leonardo da VinciMona Lisa (1503-1505) Musée du Louvre, Paris
Mona_Lisa
Italian Renaissance master Leonardo da Vinci painted his portrait of Lisa Gherardini (also known as Lisa del Giocondo or La Gioconda) on a 2.5 ft. tall by 1.7 ft. wide panel of Lombardy poplar with oil paints. The model’s pose is reminiscent of traditional Madonna paintings, with aerial perspective showing an idealized landscape. The composition is pyramidal, as with many of Leonardo’s works, but Leonardo creates a distance by inserting the arm of the chair between the subject and the viewer. The Mona Lisa, with the subject’s enigmatic expression, is considered the most famous painting in the world. It has been studied, copied and parodied and has been used in over 2,000 advertisements.  Visitors to the Louvre in Paris, where it is located, view the painting for an average of 15 seconds each.

Michelangelo (Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni): Frescoes, Sistine Chapel
Ceiling (1508-1512) Vatican Palace, Vatican City
sistine_ceilingMichelangelo_-_Creation_of_Adam
The Sistine Chapel, the Papal Chapel of the Vatican, was built between 1473 and 1481. Various artists painted frescoes on the walls between 1481 and 1508 (including Botticelli’s Punishment of the Rebels and Perugino’s Delivery of the Keys), when Michelangelo began work on the ceiling. Michelangelo, who was given permission to determine the content of his frescoes, painted nine scenes on the themes of the Creation of the World, God’s Relationship with Man, and Man’s Fall from Grace. He also painted various Biblical and Classical figures on the pendentives and around the windows. Contrary to myth, Michelangelo did not lie on his back but stood upright on scaffolding while executing the work, which required him to tilt his head backward for long periods. A major restoration from 1980-1999 revealed again the brilliance of the original colors, although some critics attacked the restorers, saying they had gone too far. The images above show: (1) the entire ceiling and (2) the Creation of Man.

Matthias GrünewaldThe Isenheim Altarpiece (1509-1515) Musée Unterlinden,
Colmar, France

Grunewald_Isenheim2
Isenheim 2
Altarpieces were painted and/or sculpted panels set behind the altar of a church that depicted religious scenes, often with multiple doors providing different views when open or closed. The Isenheim Altarpiece was designed for the hospital chapel of the Monastery of St. Anthony in Isenheim, France, where the monks specialized in hospital work. The altarpiece contains a sculpted scene by Niclaus of Hagenau when fully open but is best known for Grünewald’s paintings. The overall scheme is intended to relate the sufferings of Jesus and the saints to the work being done by the monks to heal the sick.  The first view (first image above), with the wings closed, shows the Crucifixion in the center, and two protectors of the sick, St. Sebastian (being martyred) on the left wing and St. Anthony on the right wing. The predella below shows the Lamentation over Christ’s Dead Body. In keeping with the theme of healing the sick, the Crucifixion scene shows Christ’s twisted torso afflicted with plague-like sores. The center panel measures 9 ft. tall by 10 ft. wide and each wing is 7.5 ft. tall by 2.5 ft. wide, while the predella is 2.5 ft. high by 11 ft. wide. The second view shows the Annunciation, the Nativity (with a concert of angels) and the Resurrection (see second image above). The third view contains two paintings of events in the life of St. Anthony, with sculpted figures of St. Anthony, St. Augustine and St. Jerome in the center (see third image above). The paintings use the most recent Renaissance techniques, but they are used in service of an expressionistic Gothic realism that inspired 20th Century Expressionists such as Otto Dix and George Grosz. The Isenheim Altarpiece is now at the Unterlinden Museum at Colmar in Alsace, France.  Random Trivia: German composer Paul Hindemith based a symphony and an opera, both called Mathis der Maler, on Matthias Grünewald and The Isenheim Altarpiece.

Pablo PicassoLes Demoiselles d’Avignon (1907) Museum of Modern Art, New York

Spanish painter Pablo Picasso’s 1907 portrait of five prostitutes from a Barcelona brothel caused nothing less than an artistic revolution; it heralded a new modernism in art, including the birth of Cubism. Painted in Paris during the summer of 1907 using oil paints on a canvas measuring 8 ft. tall by 7.7 ft. wide, Les Demoiselles d’Avignon breaks all the rules: Picasso makes little attempt to create the illusion of three-dimensionality; he ignores the rules of perspective and abandons the idea of proportionality.  Space in the painting’s world is fragmented and compressed; sharp angles abound – even a slice of cantaloupe becomes a lethal weapon. His women are not beautiful; their sharp-edged bodies seem capable of violence. In perhaps the most shocking of the painting’s shocks, the two figures on the right possess grotesque features influenced by Iberian sculpture and perhaps (although Picasso denied it) African masks. While on a surface level the painting may be ‘about’ sex, it is even more about the act of seeing and the act of making art. In Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, Picasso shows us that three-dimensionality on a two-dimensional canvas is an illusion, and that perhaps the only way an artist can create truthfully is to expose the nature of that illusion. Les Demoiselles d’Avignon is now in the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

On 14 Lists
El Greco (Doménikos Theotokópoulos): The Burial of the Count of Orgaz (1586) Iglesia de Santo Tomé, Toledo, Spain

El_Greco_-_The_Burial_of_the_Count_of_Orgaz_detail
Born on the island of Crete, Doménikos Theotokópoulos (known as El Greco) spent most of his life in Spain, where he painted his most-praised work, The Burial of the Count of Orgaz (also known as The Burial of Count Orgaz). Made with oils on a canvas measuring 15.7 ft. tall by 11.8 ft. wide, the painting depicts a 14th Century Spanish legend in which St. Stephen and St. Augustine descend from heaven to bury Don Gonzalo Ruíz, a Toledo noble and knight who had been generous to the Church (see first image above).  El Greco was commissioned to paint the scene in the side-chapel of the Virgin in his parish church of Santo Tomé in Toledo, Spain. The painting was famous in El Greco’s lifetime for its accurate portrayals of many Toledo notables (including a self-portrait, see second image above). Painting in the Mannerist style (with elements that hearken back to the Byzantine), El Greco divides the canvas between the heavens and the earth, but does not ground the scene by providing a horizon line or a perspectival vanishing point, omissions that serve to emphasize the supernatural quality of the events depicted. Scholars have particularly praised El Greco’s adept use of color in the work, from the black and gold of the nobles’ clothing to the grays and ochres in the heavenly scene, and the touch of bright red contrasting with Mary’s deep blue cloak. The painting remains in the Santo Tomé Church in Toledo.

Francisco Goya (Francisco José de Goya y Lucientes): The Third of May, 1808 (1814)
Museo del Prado, Madrid
Third of May_Francisco_de_Goya
In February 1814, after the Spanish had finally expelled Napoleon and his French troops after seven years of occupation and war, artist Francisco Goya approached the provisional Spanish government seeking permission to create a painting that would “perpetuate … the most notable and heroic actions of our glorious insurrection against the Tyrant of Europe.”  On May 2, 1808, the people of Madrid rose up against occupying French troops, the event that sparked the War of Spanish Independence. Permission granted, Goya chose to depict the events of the day after the failed uprising – May 3, 1808. At dawn that day, French troops rounded up and summarily shot hundreds of Spaniards suspected of being involved in the Dos de Mayo revolt. In The Third of May, 1808, Goya imagines one of the French firing squads and its Spanish victims, An unarmed man in a glowing white shirt bravely confronts the rifles of the faceless French soldiers.  He holds his arms up in a manner that simultaneously suggests outrage, a willingness to die for a righteous cause and, as scholars have noted, the posture of Christ on the cross. Goya presents this man to us as a tragic victim of injustice and cruelty, but also as a martyr and a hero. With its non-religious subject, its realistic treatment of war and its powerful emotional content, The Third of May 1808 is considered one of the first modern art masterpieces. Made with oils on a canvas measuring 8.8 ft. tall by 11.4 ft. wide, Goya’s The Third of May, 1808 is now at the Museo del Prado in Madrid.

Vincent van GoghThe Starry Night (1889) Museum of Modern Art, NY
Van_Gogh_-_Starry_Night
Dutch Post-Impressionist painter Vincent van Gogh painted The Starry Night in June 1889 while staying at a sanitarium in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence in southern France in an attempt to cure his ever-worsening mental illness. The swirling turbulent sky contrasts with the peaceful sleeping town below. Some have interpreted the painting as an expression of hope, while others see it as a symptom of van Gogh’s illness. The Starry Night shows the view from van Gogh’s sanitarium window, although he invented the cypress tree, presumably to balance the composition. Instead of painting at night, van Gogh painted the scene during the day from memory. While van Gogh’s treatment of the night sky depicts an emotional reality instead of a literal one, his observations of the moon and stars were accurate enough to allow modern astronomers to determine the date of the painting and pinpoint van Gogh’s location. The Starry Night was made with oils on a canvas measuring 2.4 ft. high by 3 ft. wide and is now located at the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

Edvard MunchThe Scream (1893) National Gallery, Oslo; Munch Museum, Oslo

munch the scream 3  The Scream by Edvard Munch  Munch_-_The_Scream_-1910 tempera
Norwegian Expressionist Edvard Munch said that he painted The Scream of Nature, now known as The Scream, to commemorate an incident in which the clouds turned blood red and he “sensed a scream passing through nature.” The painting has now become a pop culture icon. Munch painted four versions of The Scream between 1893 and 1910, all of which are shown above: (1) The Scream, 1893, made with tempera and crayon on cardboard, measuring 3.1 ft. tall by 2.4 ft. wide, now in the National Gallery in Oslo, Norway: (2) The Scream, 1893, made with crayons on cardboard, now in the Munch Museum in Oslo; (3) The Scream, 1895, made with pastels on cardboard, measuring 2.6 ft. tall by 1.9 ft. wide, now in a private collection (sold at auction for $120 million in 2012); and (4) The Scream, 1910, made with tempera on cardboard, now at the Munch Museum in Oslo. Munch also made approximately 48 black and white lithographic prints of the image from a lithographic stone he made in 1895. Thieves stole the 1893 version from the National Gallery in 1994, but it was recovered a few months later. The 1910 version in the Munch Museum was stolen in 2004 and recovered in 2007. Random Trivia: Penciled into the sky of the 1893 version of The Scream in the National Gallery are the words (in Norwegian), “Could only have been painted by a madman.”  No one knows who scribbled it there, but Munch never had it removed.

Pablo PicassoGuernica (1937) Reina Sofia Museum, Madrid
guernica
An anti-war icon, Guernica was Picasso’s impassioned response to the bombing of a Basque Country village by German and Italian warplanes supporting Franco’s Nationalists on April 27, 1937, during the Spanish Civil War. Picasso painted Guernica, made with oils on a canvas measuring 11.5 ft. tall by 25.5 ft. wide, for the Spanish Pavilion of the 1937 World’s Fair in Paris, where he was living at the time. Ironically, the theme of the Exposition was a celebration of modern technology. Guernica was painted using a palette of mostly black, white and gray to set a somber tone.  Among the elements of the work are: (1) on the left, a bull stands over a grieving woman holding a dead child; (2) the bull’s tail becomes a flame with smoke; (3) in the center, a horse with a gaping wound in its side falls in agony; (4) beneath the horse lies a dead soldier; his severed arm holds a broken sword from which a flower grows; (5) a lightbulb/evil eye/sun (lightbulb is ‘bombilla’ in Spanish, while ‘bomba’ is Spanish for bomb) hangs over the horse’s head; (6) a woman floats into the room through a window to witness the horror, while her long arm holds a lamp near the lightbulb; (7) a woman stares up blankly at the lightbulb; (8) instead of tongues, daggers emerge from the mouths of the bull, the horse and the grieving woman; (9) there is a drawing of a dove with an olive branch on the wall, and a crack in the wall lets light in from outside; and (10) a man on the far right raises his arms in terror as fire engulfs him from above and below.  Interpretations of the mural are many and varied and often contradict one another, although all agree that this is Picasso’s protest against the bombing of Guernica in particular and war in general. Picasso’s response to questions about the meaning of his work was, “This bull is a bull and this horse is a horse.” After the Fascists won the Civil War, Picasso refused to allow the painting to go to Spain as long as they remained in power. As a result, Guernica was sent to New York and exhibited at Museum of Modern Art until 1981, after the restoration of democracy in Spain. Upon its arrival in Spain, Guernica was displayed in the Casón del Buen Retiro, part of the Museo del Prado in Madrid.  In 1992, the painting was moved to a specially-constructed gallery in the Museo Reina Sofia in Madrid.

13 Lists
Sandro Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano di Vanni Filipepi): The Birth of Venus (1486)
Uffizi Gallery, Florence
Birth of Venus 2Sandro Botticelli painted The Birth of Venus in 1486 for the Medici family of Florence, using tempera on a canvas measuring 5.7 ft. high by 9.1 ft wide. In Roman mythology, Venus was the goddess of love, beauty and sex. In one of her representations, Venus Anadyomene, she was said to have been born from the sea as an adult woman. This aspect of her myth was the basis for one of Hesiod’s odes, which was revised by Italian Renaissance poet Angelo Poliziano. Botticelli shows the wind gods Zephyr and Aura bringing a nude Venus to the shore, while she stands in a contrapposto pose on a seashell (symbol of female sexuality). She poses shyly in the famous Venus Pudica stance, waiting for one of the Graces to cover up her nudity with a cape. Scholars have noted that Venus’s pose is impossible: she is putting too much weight on one leg to stay balanced, and her position on the seashell would cause it to tip forward. The Birth of Venus is now at the Uffizi Gallery in Florence.

Hieronymus BoschThe Garden of Earthly Delights (c. 1510) Museo del Prado, Madrid
bosch Bosch,_The_Garden_of_Earthly_Delights,_central_panel_-_Detail_ Bosch_- _The_Garden_of_Earthly_Delights_exterior_(shutters)
Made with oil paints on oak panels measuring almost 13 ft. long and more than 7 ft. tall, Hieronymus Bosch’s Garden of Earthly Delights is a triptych with two side panels that close over the center (see first image above). The left panel shows God with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden and the right panel shows the torments of Hell. The ambiguous central panel may show either the temptations of earthly life or a lost earthly paradise (see detail in the second image above). The view when the side panels are closed is a transparent globe showing earth during the Creation before the creation of man, probably on the Third Day of Genesis, Chapter 1 (see third image above). Bosch’s unique vision has a long legacy. In particular, his fantastic creatures and contraptions proved inspirational for the Surrealists centuries later.  The Garden of Earthly Delights is now at the Museo del Prado in Madrid.

12 Lists
Masaccio (Tommaso di Ser Giovanni di Simone): Frescoes, Brancacci Chapel (1424-1428) Santa Maria del Carmine, Florence
The Tribute Money is one of Masaccio's frescoes in the Brancacci Chapel.
   masaccio st peter healing the sick   masaccio distribution of alms
Of the 15 frescoes in the Brancacci Chapel in Florence’s Santa Maria del Carmine Church, scholars believe that at least six are attributable to Italian artist Tommaso Masaccio.  Masaccio had begun as the assistant to the commissioned artist, Masolino da Panicale, but he eventually took over the project (although he, too, left it unfinished, to be completed by Filippino Lippi). Of the six Masaccio frescoes in the chapel, The Tribute Money (8.1 ft. tall by 19.6 ft. wide), which depicts the story of Peter and the tax collector from the Gospel of Matthew (see first image above), and The Expulsion of Adam and Eve (also known as Expulsion from the Garden of Eden, measuring about 7 ft. tall by 3 ft. wide) (second image above), are considered high points of Early Renaissance style, with an emotional intensity, substantiality, and use of perspective not seen in Gothic and Medieval painting. The frescoes were restored in the 1980s and fig leaves were removed from Adam and Eve (see second image above). Other Masaccio frescoes from the Brancacci Chapel shown in the images above are: (3) St. Peter Heals the Sick with His Shadow; and (4) The Distribution of Alms and Death of Ananias.

11 Lists
Pieter Bruegel the ElderThe Hunters in the Snow (1565) Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna Bruegel_Hunters_in_the_SnowHunters in the snow detail
Flemish artist Pieter Bruegel the Elder painted The Hunters in the Snow (also known as The Return of the Hunters) with oil paint on wood panel measuring 3.8 feet tall by 5.3 feet wide (see first image, above).  It is one of a series of paintings by Bruegel depicting either the months or the seasons commissioned by Niclaes Jonghelinck, a wealthy Antwerp merchant. This and other paintings depict the terrible winter of 1565, part of the Little Ice Age that befell Europe from 1400-1850.  The craggy Alpine peaks in the distance seem out of place for the Netherlands (see second image, above). Together with the birds, the crags hint at a symbolic undertone to this highly detailed and realistic slice-of-life scene. The Hunters in the Snow is now in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna.

Théodore GéricaultThe Raft of the Medusa (1818-1819) Musée du Louvre, Paris
GÉRICAULT_raft of the medusa
Medusa_horizon_detail
The Raft of the Medusa, which is painted on an immense canvas measuring 16 ft. tall by 23.5 ft. wide, depicts the moment when survivors of the wrecked French frigate Méduse finally spied a ship heading in their direction (see first image above). The Méduse ran aground in 1816 due to the incompetence of its captain.  Lack of adequate lifeboats forced at least 147 passengers and crew to crowd onto a makeshift raft, where lack of food and water led to starvation, murder and cannibalism.  After 13 days at sea, the 15 who remained alive spotted their rescuers (see second image above) – it was this moment that Théodore Géricault, then a relatively unknown 27-year-old French artist, chose to paint in all of its grisly detail.  In researching the painting, Géricault interviewed survivors and constructed a scale model of the raft. When Géricault exhibited The Raft of the Medusa at the 1819 Paris Salon, its vivid representation of suffering and death repelled the then-dominant Neoclassicists, but the rising Romanticists found it powerful and praised its politics. The Raft of the Medusa is now considered a seminal work in the history of French Romantic art. Made with oils on canvas, The Raft of the Medusa is now located in the Louvre in Paris. Random Trivia:  The model for the foreground figure with downturned face and outstretched arm was French painter Eugène Delacroix, a friend of Géricault’s. 

Grant Wood: American Gothic (1930) Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

One of the most recognized pieces of American art, American Gothic depicts two figures standing in front of the Dibble house in Eldon, Iowa. The house was built in the Carpenter Gothic style; it was the architecture that first interested American painter Grant Wood, who thought that adding a Gothic window to an ordinary frame house was pretentious, and gave the work its title. Wood made a pencil sketch of the house while visiting Eldon in August 1930; he returned the next day (with the permission of the owners) to make another sketch using oils on paperboard. When Wood returned to his studio in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, he recruited his sister Nan to pose for the woman and his dentist, Dr. Byron McKeeby, to pose for the man. Although there is some evidence that Wood’s initial intent was to portray a husband and wife, Nan insisted that she was supposed to be the farmer’s daughter, not his wife, and Wood never disputed her interpretation. Wood entered the painting in a contest at the Art Institute of Chicago; it won third place and a cash prize of $300. Contemporary critics and the public interpreted the painting as a biting satire of small-town rural America, but at some point during the Great Depression, American Gothic acquired a reputation as a tribute to the steadfast pioneer spirit. Wood’s iconic image was even selected for a patriotic poster by the U.S. Government during World War II. In modern times, the painting has been the source of many parodies, mostly affectionate, and is considered a cultural icon. American Gothic, made with oils on a canvas measuring 2.4 ft. tall by 2 ft. wide, is now in the Art Institute of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois.

10 Lists
Michelangelo (Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni): The Last Judgment (Fresco, Sistine Chapel Altar Wall) (1534-1541) Sistine Chapel, Vatican Palace, Vatican City

   
Twenty-five years after painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo returned to paint a giant fresco of The Last Judgment on the altar wall. The fresco, which measures 45 ft. tall by 39 ft. wide, shows Christ’s second coming and the division of the saved from the damned (see first image above). At the top of the composition, angels bring the symbols of Christ’s passion, including the cross and crown of thorns. Due to Michelangelo’s reputation, he was able to negotiate a significant amount of artistic freedom in exercising the commission from Pope Paul III. Nevertheless, the nudity of many of the figures in the fresco alarmed some clerics. Even before the painting was complete, the Pope’s master of ceremonies, Biagio da Cesena, called the work “disgraceful” and said that it was more appropriate for the “public baths and taverns.” In response, Michelangelo painted Cesena’s face on Minos, judge of the underworld, giving him donkey ears and wrapping a serpent around him to cover (and bite!) his genitals (see second image above). When Cesena protested, the Pope reportedly quipped that he could do nothing because his jurisdiction did not extend to Hell. After Michelangelo’s death in 1564, the Vatican ordered Daniele da Volterra to paint over many of the figures’ genitalia. Many of these fig leaves were removed over 400 years later during the extensive cleaning between 1980 and 1994. Restorers relied heavily on a copy of Michelangelo’s The Last Judgment commissioned by Cardinal Allesandro Farnese and painted by Marcello Venusti in 1549, before the fig leaves were added. (Venusti’s copy, now in the Museo da Capodimonte in Naples, is shown in the third image above.) Unfortunately, the restorers found that in some cases Volterra had scraped off the offending material and painted on fresh plaster instead of merely painting over the original, thus permanently marring the masterpiece.

Gian Lorenzo Bernini: The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa (1647-1652) Capella Cornaro, Santa Maria della Vittoria, Rome
 

Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa is a masterwork of the High Roman Baroque style of the Counter-Reformation and its emphasis on theatricality and appealing to the senses of the viewer.  The life-size white marble sculpture of St. Teresa and an angel is set in an elevated space in the Cornaro Chapel of Santa Maria della Vittoria in Rome (see third image above). The statue was commissioned by Cardinal Federico Cornaro, who had chosen the church of the Discalced Carmelite order of nuns and priests for his burial chapel. Teresa of Ávila, who described her experience of religious ecstasy in almost sexual terms, had become the first Discalced Carmelite saint in 1622. Saint Teresa appears to lean back on a cloud as she experiences a vision of an angel who has plunged his arrow into her heart, causing her physical pain but spiritual joy (see first image above).  Bernini, who was also an architect, sets the sculptural group in a niche where natural light can filter through a hidden window in the church dome.  A moan escapes from St. Teresa’s throat as her face and body express her love of God through the metaphor of physical ecstasy (see second image above). To complete the theme of religious event as theater, Bernini’s design for the Cornaro chapel includes a balcony on either side of the main event, where the Cardinal’s relatives look on.

Georges Seurat: A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte (1886) Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
A_Sunday_on_La_Grande_Jatte,_Georges_Seurat

French Post-Impressionist Georges Seurat’s A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of Grand Jatte (sometimes called A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of Grand Jatte – 1884) is the most famous example of pointillism, a technique in which the artist uses small dots of color instead of brushstrokes, which the eye then perceives as figures and other shapes (see first image above). At the time the work was painted, the island of Grand Jatte in the Seine was far from the center of Paris and was known as a recreational retreat for the bourgeoisie, with its own prostitutes, possibly symbolized by the woman fishing in the lower left. The painting forms a companion piece to the large Bathers at Asnières of the same year, which shows working class Parisians on the banks of the Seine across from Grand Jatte (see second image above). One of the boys in Bathers at Asnières is calling over to Grand Jatte, creating a link between the two paintings. In contrast to Bathers at Asnières, which is set in glaring sunlight, many of the people on Grande Jatte are in shade. One of the people who is not in shadow is a young girl dressed in white in the center of the painting who stares directly at the viewer and seems to be silently questioning us. A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of Grand Jatte, made with oils on a canvas measuring 7 ft. tall by 10 ft. wide, is now in the Art Institute of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois.

Salvador Dali: The Persistence of Memory (1931) Museum of Modern Art, New York
dali persistence of memory
The Persistence of Memory is Spanish surrealist Salvador Dali’s most famous creation (other than perhaps himself). Dali and other surrealist painters, who drew much of their inspiration from the theories of Sigmund Freud, presented dream-like imagery in a highly realistic and exact style. In addition to the four ‘soft’ or ‘melting’ pocket watches (one covered by ants, a symbol of decay), Dali paints a gruesome self-portrait in the center, a sort of monster with one closed eye, who may be dreaming. The background landscape and the looming mountain casting an immense shadow over the foreground reference Dali’s native Catalonia. Small but thought-provoking, The Persistence of Memory was made with oils on a canvas measuring 9.5 in. tall by 13 in. wide and is now in the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

9 Lists
Thutmose (attrib.): Bust of Queen Nefertiti (c. 1345 BCE) Agyptisches Museum, Berlin

In 1912, while excavating the workshop of Ancient Egyptian sculptor Thutmose in Amarna, Egypt, German archaeologists led by Ludwig Borchardt found a painted bust of Nefertiti, queen of Egypt and wife of Akhenaten, who ruled from 1352 to 1336 BCE.  (There is some evidence that Nefertiti herself may have ruled Egypt, either with her husband or after his death.) The bust is composed of a limestone core with painted layers of stucco; it is 19 inches tall and weighs 44 pounds. The absence of an inlay in the left eye supports a theory that the bust was a sculptor’s modello that was kept in the studio to be used as the basis for other portraits of the queen. The “Nefertiti cap crown” is recognizable in other portraits of the queen. The cobra symbol, or uraeus, on her forehead has been damaged. According to experts, the bust with its slender neck and very large head does not possess many of the attributes of the new Amarna style that developed under Akhenaten, but hearkens back to more Classical forms. CT scans reveal that earlier versions of the bust show a much older queen, with wrinkles on her face and neck and a swelling on her nose, but that the final layers of stucco eliminated these flaws. After discovering the bust, Borchardt brought it back to Germany, where it has been ever since, despite requests from Egypt to repatriate it since the 1930s. There is considerable controversy over the removal of the bust from Egypt.  There are allegations that when Germany and Egypt divided up the finds of Borchardt’s dig, the Germans downplayed or actively disguised the nature and value of the bust, showing Egyptian officials only a poorly-taken photograph and ensuring that it was thoroughly wrapped up when Egyptian authorities conducted an inspection. To complicate matters, at the time, Egypt was under the control of European powers. The Bust of Nefertiti is now in the Egyptian Museum in Berlin, where the queen has her own room.

Duccio (Duccio di Buoninsegna): Maestà Altarpiece (1308-11)
Museo dell’Opera Metropolitana del Duomo, Siena

maesta duccio 2
Duccio di Buoninsegna painted the Maestà Altarpiece for the city of Siena. The original piece, made with tempera and gold on wood panels measuring 15.4 ft. high by 16.4 ft. wide, contained paintings on the front and rear that indicated a step away from Gothic and Byzantine styles and toward a more realistic representation of people and things. The front consisted of the large Madonna and Child with saints and angels at center (see first image above), with a predella containing scenes from Christ’s childhood and additional portraits and scenes above. The rear contained 43 small scenes showing the Life of Christ and Life of the Virgin (see second image above). Unfortunately, in 1711, the altarpiece was dismantled and sawed into pieces, which were distributed to various locations. In 1956, an attempt was made to bring all the extant pieces back together in Siena’s Museo dell’Opera Metropolitana del Duomo, but it was only partially successful. Portions of the altarpiece may be found in museums around the world. 

The Limbourg BrothersLes Très Riches Heurs du Duc de Berry (1411-1416) Musée Condé, Chantilly, France
 les_tres_riches_heures_du_duc_de_berry_octobre   les_tres_riches_heures_du_duc_de_berry-zodiac
A prime example of the International Gothic style, Les Très Riches Heures is a Book of Hours, a type of prayer book, that was created for John, Duke of Berry. The book, which measures 11.8 in. high and 8.5 in. wide, contains a total of 206 sheets of vellum, with 66 large miniatures and 65 small paintings made with tempera. The book begins with a series of calendar pages and a zodiac, followed by numerous prayers. Most of the work was done by the three Dutch Limbourg Brothers (Paul, Jean and Herman) between 1411-1416, but they left the project unfinished, so it was completed by others, including Jean Colombe, in the 1480s. Seen above are: (1) The page for January, showing the exchange of New Year’s gifts among the Duke’s family and friends (note battle mural on the back wall); (2) the page for October, with workers in the fields and the Louvre Castle; and (3) the zodiac with the signs displayed on the body of a young man, then again in the frame surrounding the two figures.

Jan van EyckThe Arnolfini Portrait (Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his Wife) (1434)  National Gallery, London
  
The Arnolfini Portrait (painted on three vertical oak panels measuring 2.8 ft. high by 2 ft. wide) is one of the earliest masterpieces made with oil paint.  Van Eyck applied layer after layer of thin translucent glazes to create intense tones and colors.  The painting is designed to emphasize the wealth of its subjects – Giovanni di Nicolao Arnolfini (if in fact he is the man in the picture) was a well-to-do Italian merchant living in Bruges, Flanders (see first image, above). It was assumed since the 19th Century that this was a portrait of Arnolfini and his wife, but in 1997, art historians discovered that Arnolfini married six years after the death of Jan van Eyck, so unless there was an earlier marriage, the subjects may have been misidentified.  Some of the objects in the room have symbolic value. The dog, for example, is a symbol of marital fidelity. In a tour de force of technique, van Eyck creates an image in the mirror on the rear wall showing the two portrait subjects as well as two other figures standing in the doorway, one of whom may be a self-portrait of the artist (see second image, above). The Arnolfini Portrait (also known as Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his Wife) is now in the National Gallery in London.

Michelangelo (Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni): Pietà (1497-1499)
St. Peter’s Basilica, Vatican City

Pietà refers to the pose of Mary holding the body of Jesus after his Crucifixion – Michelangelo Buonarroti’s late 15th Century masterpiece was the first Italian sculpture on the subject.  Michelangelo depicts Mary as younger, calmer and less sorrowful than in other versions of the scene. Made of Carrara marble and measuring 5.7 ft. tall by 6.4 ft. wide, the Pietà was commissioned by Cardinal Jean de Bilhères and was originally intended for his funeral monument but was eventually moved to a chapel in St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican. Random Trivia: The Pietà is the only work that Michelangelo ever signed, reportedly after he overheard someone attributing the work to artist Cristoforo Solari, one of his competitors. 

Raphael (Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino): The School of Athens (1510-1511)
Stanza della Signatura, Vatican Palace, Vatican City
school of athensplato and aristotle   school of athens detail
Measuring 16.5 ft. high by 25 ft. wide, The School of Athens is one of several frescoes that Italian Renaissance artist Raphael painted on the walls of a suite of reception rooms in the Vatican Palace.  The School of Athens, an allegorical painting on the topic of philosophy, adorns one wall of the Stanza della Segnatura (Room of the Signatura) and bears the inscription “Causarum Cognito” (“Seek Knowledge of Causes”).  The frescoes on the other three walls represent Poetry and Music, Theology and Law.  With impeccable attention to the laws of perspective, Raphael shows an open forum that recedes into the background.  At the center, at the perspectival vanishing point, Plato (holding the Timaeus) and Aristotle (with the Nicomachean Ethics) walk and talk together (see second image above). The remaining figures represent other philosophers, but there is some dispute about their identities. Most scholars agree that Socrates, Pythagoras, Euclid, Ptolemy and Zoroaster are among those pictured. As models for some of the figures, Raphael drew upon his fellow artists; art historians have found portraits of Leonardo da Vinci (as Plato), Michelangelo (as Heraclitus), Donatello (as Plotinus), Bramante (as Euclid or Archimedes), and Raphael’s own self-portrait (as Apelles) in The School of Athens (see third image above, far right). Random Trivia: Rock band Guns n’ Roses used two of the figures from The School of Athens in the cover art for their Use Your Illusion albums.

Édouard Manet: A Bar at the Folies-Bergère (1882) Courtauld Gallery, London
Bar_at_the_Folies-Bergère
Manet’s last major painting, A Bar at the Folies-Bergère has sparked lively scholarly debate for its treatment of perspective, as well as its implications regarding the relationships of men and women. The central character is a barmaid, who is standing in front of a huge mirror that reflects her, a customer and the rest of the establishment.  The bowl of oranges on the bar may symbolize prostitution, which was common at Folies-Bergère – but Manet leaves us guessing about the barmaid’s true profession. Although some have stated that the reflections are physically impossible – where is the man we see in the mirror facing the barmaid? – a reenactment of the scene proved that the painting is accurate if the viewer is standing off to the side and not in the center. A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, made with oils on a canvas measuring 3.2 ft. tall by 4.3 ft. wide, is now located at the Courtauld Institute of Art in London.

8 Lists
Unknown Artists: Terracotta Army (246-208 BCE) Tomb of the Emperor Qin Shi Huang,
Shaanxi, Xi’an, China
terracotta army 
The Terracotta Army consists of approximately 8,000 unique, life-size sculpted soldiers, 130 chariots with 520 horses, 150 cavalry horses, and various pieces of armor, weapons, and non-military figures and implements (see first image above).  They are part of an immense burial complex for the Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of China and were intended to protect the emperor in the afterlife. The archaeological treasure was discovered in 1974 by a group of farmers digging a well.  Each terracotta warrior has a unique face (see second image above).  Position and uniform are consistent with the rank and special skills of each soldier.  The figures were constructed in separate pieces in workshops by government laborers and local craftsmen, then assembled and painted (very little of the paint remains), then arranged in the tomb according to rank and duty.  Although most of the figures are made of terracotta, items such as a 1/2 life-size team of horses and chariot are made of bronze, silver and gold (see third image above).

Alexandros of Antioch: Venus de Milo (Aphrodite of Milos) (130-100 BCE)
Musée du Louvre, Paris
venus de milo 1  venus de milo 2
The Venus de Milo is a Greek marble sculpture of Aphrodite (Roman name Venus) made by Alexandros of Antioch in the 2nd Century BCE during the Hellenist period. It stands 6.7 ft. tall.  The statue was found by a Greek peasant, Yorgos Kentrotas, and a French naval officer, Olivier Voutier, in the ruins of the ancient city of Milos on the Aegean island known variously as Milos, Melos or Milo, then part of the Ottoman Empire.  At the time it was discovered, the statue was in several pieces, which included part of the left arm and the left hand holding an apple, as well as a plinth with an inscription by Alexandros.  By the time the French bought the statue from the Turks and brought it to the Louvre in Paris, the arms had disappeared.  Then, soon afterwards, the plinth with Alexandros’ inscription also vanished, presumably because the Hellenistic time frame was considered less prestigious than an older Greek provenance. Scholars have been searching for the missing pieces ever since.

Simone Martini and Lippo Memmi: St. Ansanus Altarpiece (1333-1335) Uffizi Gallery, Florence
Simone_Martini_The_Annunciation_and_Two_Saints 2
Known by various names (e.g. St. Ansanus Altarpiece; The AnnunciationThe Annunciation with Two Saints; The Annunciation with St. Margaret and St. Ansanus), this Gothic altarpiece from the early 14th Century was painted by Simone Martini and his brother-in-law Lippo Memmi using tempera, gold leaf and lapis lazuli on wood panel for the St. Ansanus side altar in the Siena Cathedral.  Measuring 8.6 ft. tall by 10 ft. wide, the Annunciation scene in the central panel is praised for its realism and symbolic detail, from the dove amidst a mandorla of angels, to Angel Gabriel’s cloak, still whirling from his flight, and the olive branch he carries, and Mary’s arabesque gown, startled expression and reading book.

Jan and Hubert van EyckThe Ghent Altarpiece (1432) St. Bavo Cathedral, Ghent, Belgium

ghent   Ghent_Altarpiece_Adoration_of_the_Lamb_2   ghent-altarpiece-donor-and-st-john-the-baptist
The Ghent Altarpiece (also known as Adoration of the Mystic Lamb) was made for the Church of St. John the Baptist (now St. Bavo Cathedral) in Ghent, Belgium, where it is still located.  The large altarpiece (11 ft. tall by 15 ft. wide when open) consists of 12 panels, eight of them with hinged shutters.  The commission from merchant and mayor Joost Vijdt was given to Hubert van Eyck, but many scholars believe Hubert’s brother Jan painted most or all of the piece. When closed, the altarpiece shows the Annunciation, imitation statues of two saints, and portraits of the donor and his wife, Joost Vijdt and Lysbette Borluut (see second image, above). The fourth image above shows the donor portrait and the ‘sculpture’ of John the Baptist in detail. The brightly-colored interior panels show: (top row) God the Father, dressed as the Pope, Mary, St. John the Baptist, musical angels and Adam and Eve and (bottom row) a grand celebration of Jesus as the Lamb of God (see first image, above). The third image above shows the Adoration of the Lamb in detail, showing the Lamb of God bleeding into the Holy Grail. The style combines aspects of International Gothic, Byzantine and Romanesque, but the lack of idealization (see, for example, the individualized faces of the angels) and the attention to detail indicate a new artistic conception that may show the influence of the Italian Renaissance.

Jan van EyckMadonna of Chancellor Rolin (1434-1435) Musée du Louvre, Paris

Virgin_with_Chancellor_Rolin-Detail
The Madonna of Chancellor Rolin was commissioned by Nicolas Rolin, the chancellor of the Duchy of Burgundy, for his parish church in Autun, France (see first image, above).  It was common practice to paint the donor into the painting, but before the Renaissance, such figures were painted on a much smaller scale than the saints and religious icons.  Here, Rolin and the Madonna are equal size, a reflection of the humanism that characterized the Renaissance.  Jan van Eyck, a master of the Early Netherlandish school, is known for his attention to detail.  Here, note the intricacies of the floor tiles, the crown that the angel is holding, the carvings on the columns, and the landscape outside, with churches, a garden and additional figures (see second image, above). The Madonna of Chancellor Rolin, also known as Virgin and Child with Chancellor Rolin, made with oils on a wood panel measuring 2.2 ft. high by 2 ft. wide, is now in the Louvre in Paris.

Rogier van der Weyden: Descent from the Cross (Deposition of Christ) (c. 1435)
Museo del Prado, Madrid

deposition st john   Weyden,_Rogier_van_der_-_Descent_from_the_Cross_-_Detail_Mary_Magdalene
Flemish artist Rogier van der Weyden was commissioned by the Leuven guild of archers to make this large panel painting (7 ft. tall by 8.5 ft. wide) of Christ being lowered from the cross into the arms of Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, which originally hung in the guild’s chapel (see first image). In honor of the donor guild, Christ’s body approximates the shape of a crossbow. This is an early depiction of the swooning Mary figure (echoing her son’s pose), which soon became standard iconography, although it has no basis in Scripture. The painting is considered one of the most unique and influential of the 15th Century and was copied many times. Scholars have pointed out the vividness of the colors and the realistic facial expressions, including a tearful St. John reaching down to help Mary (see second image above). Mary Magdalene’s grief is expressed through her entire body (see third image above). One art historian compared the “undulating lines, swaying poses and counterposes of figures” to counterpoint in polyphonic music. The Descent from the Cross is now in the Museo del Prado in Madrid.

Piero della Francesca: The Resurrection of Christ (c. 1463-1465) Pinacoteca Comunale, Sansepolcro, Italy

Piero della Francesca painted The Resurrection of Christ on the wall of a communal meeting hall in his home town of Sansepolcro, in Tuscany, Italy. Measuring approximately 7.5 ft. tall by 6.5 ft. wide, the fresco depicts Christ as he leaves the tomb, while four soldiers – one of whom is a self-portrait of the painter – sleep. The flag with a red cross on a white background was a common symbol of the Resurrection. The painting survived World War II due to the refusal of British artillery officer Tony Clarke to shell Sansepolcro after having read accounts of the painting’s importance to art history. In gratitude, Sansepolcrans named a street after Clarke. As it happened, the Germans had already retreated so the bombing would have been pointless. The meeting hall where Piero painted the Resurrection fresco (and where it remains) is now the Museo Civico of Sansepolcro.

Hugo van der Goes: The Portinari Altarpiece (c. 1475) Uffizi Gallery, Florence
portinari altarpieceportinari_child    portinari right wing
A triptych, the Portinari Altarpiece (measuring 8.3 ft. tall by 10 ft. wide) was commissioned by Italian banker Tommaso Portinari for the church in Florence’s Santa Maria Nuova hospital (see first image, above).  Flemish painter Hugo van der Goes, using oil paints on wood, depicted the Adoration of the Shepherds in the center panel (see second image above), with the Portinari family and their patron saints on the side panels (see first image above). In a break from traditional iconography, the infant Jesus is placed on the ground, on a ‘blanket’ made of golden rays, instead of lying on a crib or on his mother’s lap (see second image above). A separate narrative goes on in the background of each panel: (1) the left wing shows Joseph and Mary on their way to Bethlehem; (2) the center panel shows the angel appearing to the shepherds; and (3) the right panel shows the Three Magi on their way to see Jesus (see third image above). When the painting arrived in Florence in 1483, its naturalistic depiction of the figures influenced Domenico Ghirlandaio and other Italian painters.

Sandro Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano di Vanni Filipepi): La Primavera (c. 1477-1482)  Uffizi Gallery, Florence
Botticelli-primavera primavera detail   botticelli-primavera-flora-fs   primavera flowers
La Primavera was painted by Sandro Botticelli using tempera on wood panels measuring 10 ft. wide and 6.67 ft. tall. The work was commissioned by a member of the Medici family. The references to Spring and love (Venus and Cupid especially) have led some scholars to believe that the painting was made for the May 1482 wedding of Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco, a cousin of the Medicis. On the far right, Zephyr, the March wind, is kidnapping the nymph Chloris (see second image above). After Zephyr marries Chloris, she is transformed into Flora, the goddess of Spring, who is shown in a floral gown scattering flowers (see third image above). At the center, Venus presides, with her son Cupid flying above her. Next to Venus, the Three Graces are dancing while Mercury provides protection. In addition to the mythological figures, Botticelli has accurately depicted 500 different plant species in La Primavera, including 190 different flowers, and, of course, orange trees, the Medici family symbol (see fourth image above).  La Primavera, also known as Spring or Allegory of Spring, is now at the Uffizi Gallery in Florence.

Leonardo da Vinci: The Last Supper (1495-1498) Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan
The-Last-Supper-Convent-of-Santa-Maria-delle-Grazie-Milan last supper before restoration
When Ludovico Sforza, Duke of Milan, asked Leonardo da Vinci to paint The Last Supper on the wall of the Sforza mausoleum, Leonardo decided to forego the fresco technique, which limited his palette, and try something new. It turned out to be a big mistake. Instead of mixing pigment with wet plaster, fresco-style, Leonardo decided to prepare the wall with a mixture of  gesso, pitch and mastic, then put on a layer of plaster, and a brightening agent (white lead), wait for it to dry and then paint on the dry plaster using  tempera. The mixture never set properly and bits of the mural began flaking off almost immediately. Add humidity, Allied bombs in World War I, angry anti-clerical French troops, a doorway cut out of the painting in 1583, and numerous botched restorations, and it is amazing there is anything left of Leonardo’s work. A comprehensive but highly controversial restoration project that ended in 1999 revealed a somewhat changed Last Supper, although it is not clear how much of it is the original. Measuring 15.1 ft. tall by 28.8 ft. wide, the painting is now on the end wall of the dining hall of the convent of the Santa Maria delle Grazie Church in Milan. It depicts the moment in the Gospel of John when Jesus tells his disciples that one of them will betray him. The reactions of the various disciples, painted in groups of threes, are shown with vivid facial expressions and gestures. Note also that, without looking, both Jesus and Judas are reaching for the same piece of bread; when their hands meet a moment later, it will be a sign that Judas is the betrayer. The painting is an excellent example of single-point perspective, as all the perspective lines meet at a vanishing point on or just above Jesus’ head. The painting has been much imitated and parodied, including tableaux vivant in the films Viridiana (Luis Buñuel, 1961) and MASH (Robert Altman, 1970).

Albrecht AltdorferThe Battle of Alexander at Issus (1529) Alte Pinakothek, Munich

the-battle-of-issus-   Albrecht_altdorfer battle of alexander
German artist Albrecht Altdorfer received a commission from Duke William IV of Bavaria to paint eight works to hang in the Duke’s Munich residence, the most highly regarded of which is The Battle of Alexander at Issus. This masterpiece depicts the 333 BCE battle in which Alexander the Great defeated Darius III of Persia (see first image above). The work, which measures 5.2 ft. tall by 4 ft. wide, is a prominent example of a world landscape painting: by ignoring the normal rules of perspective, Altdorfer shows us the details of a battle (see second image above), but also a grand overview of the known world. The dramatic sky is significant on metaphorical and symbolic levels. Although Altdorfer’s grand scale, level of detail and official banner inscription all suggest an intent to depict the historical event accurately, the painting contains numerous inaccuracies and anachronisms, some of which are surely deliberate. For example, Alexander’s men wear 16th Century armor and Darius’s troops are dressed as 16th Century Turks (see third image above). These elements lead scholars to believe Altdorfer intended to compare Alexander’s victory over the Persians with the contemporary struggle between Europe and the Ottoman Empire, as exemplified by the Siege of Vienna in 1529 (the year of the painting), where an outnumbered collection of Europeans repulsed an attack by Suleiman the Magnificent and his Ottoman warriors. The Battle of Alexander at Issus, also known as Alexander’s Victory and The Battle of Issus, is now at the Alte Pinakothek in Munich.

Johannes VermeerGirl with a Pearl Earring (1665) Mauritshuis, The Hague
Girl_With_The_Pearl_Earring_(1665)
Girl with a Pearl Earring
, which measures 17.5 in. high by 15 in. wide, is considered a tronie, a painting of a person in costume or in character, not intended to be a formal portrait. The pearl earring may symbolize chastity, while the exotic turban was a fashionable accessory in Europe beginning in the 15th Century. Many have speculated about the artist’s model, who may have appeared in other Vermeer works. Tracy Chevalier’s historical novel of the same name theorizes that she was a maid who became Vermeer’s love interest. Others say she is Vermeer’s daughter Maria.  Girl with a Pearl Earring is now in the Mauritshuis in The Hague.

Antoine Watteau (Jean-Antoine Watteau): The Embarkation for Cythera (1717)
Musée du Louvre, Paris   
watteau cythera   
The Greek island of Cythera was the birthplace of Venus, and by extension, of love. In The Embarkation for Cythera, French artist Antoine Watteau depicts loving couples in an amorous aristocratic party known as a “fête galante” (see first image above). Classical elements include a statue of Venus and a bevy of hovering Cupids. Although the painting is known by such titles as The Embarkation for CytheraVoyage to Cythera and Pilgrimage to the Isle of Cythera, some critics have noted that the figures appear to be leaving Cythera after having paired up, not preparing to go to the island (see detail in second image, above). The painting played an important role in Watteau’s career; he presented The Embarkation for Cythera to the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture as his required reception piece after being granted admission. The work was made with oils on a canvas measuring 4.2 ft. tall by 6.4 ft. wide and is now located at the Louvre in Paris.  A somewhat different version, usually referred to as Pilgrimage to Cythera, painted in 1718-1719, hangs in the Charlottenburg Palace in Berlin (see third image above).

Auguste Rodin (François-Auguste-René Rodin): The Kiss (1889) Musée Rodin, Paris
  
The marble sculpture by Auguste Rodin now known as The Kiss originally bore the title Francesca da Rimini.  According to Dante’s Divine Comedy, Francesca was a 12th Century noblewoman who fell in love with her husband’s younger brother Pablo while they read the story of Lancelot and Guinevere together, but were discovered and killed by Francesca’s husband before they could consummate their love. Rodin initially created a small sculpture of the two nude lovers embracing, about to kiss, for The Gates of Hell, a large-scale work based on The Divine Comedy and intended for the doors of a new art museum. The lovers’ lips never touch and Pablo still holds a book in his hand, implying that they were interrupted by their murderer. At some point, Rodin decided to exhibit the piece separately. In 1888, the French government commissioned a life-size marble version of Francesca da Rimini. When the statue was first exhibited in public in 1893, critics substituted the more generic title, The Kiss. The bold eroticism of the figures was controversial at first, but eventually the piece became so popular that Rodin received commissions to make numerous marble copies and bronze casts, which may be found in museums around the world.  The original life-size marble version of The Kiss, measuring nearly 6 ft. tall, 3.7 ft. wide and 3.8 ft. deep, is now at the Musée Rodin in Paris (see images above). Other large-scale marble versions made in Rodin’s lifetime are located at the Tate Modern in London and the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen.

Edward HopperNighthawks (1942)  Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Nighthawks_by_Edward_Hopperboulevard of broken dreams
The most famous work by American artist Edward Hopper, and one of the most recognizable American works of art, Nighthawks depicts a much simplified and enlarged version of a restaurant in Hopper’s Greenwich Village, New York neighborhood (see first image above). According to notes made by Hopper’s wife Josephine, she was the model for the woman at the counter, and the two men in suits are both Hopper self-portraits.  Her notes refer to the man in the suit next to the woman as “night hawk” due to his beak-like nose; she refers to the man with his back turned as “sinister.” Hopper’s treatment of artificial light at night here and elsewhere is considered masterful. The image has been copied and parodied in popular culture, most famously by Gottfried Helnwein, whose best-selling 1984 poster Boulevard of Broken Dreams inserts Humphrey Bogart, James Dean and Marilyn Monroe for the patrons, and Elvis Presley for the waiter (see second image above), substituting celebrity kitsch for the original’s dangerous and lonely anonymity.  Nighthawks, made with oils on a canvas measuring 2.75 ft. tall by 5 ft. wide, is now located at the Art Institute of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois.

7 Lists
Unknown Artist: Funerary Mask of Tutankhamun (1333-1323 BCE) Egyptian Museum, Cairo
   
Tutankhamun was an 18th Dynasty Egyptian pharaoh who ruled from 1332-1323 BCE, during the New Kingdom. He ascended to the throne at age 9 and died 10 years later at age 18.  His tomb was discovered nearly intact by Howard Carter and George Herbert, Earl of Carnavon, in 1922. The tomb contained the pharaoh’s mummy, encased in three coffins fitted inside one another. Inside the innermost case, the explorers found the funerary, or death mask. Made of solid gold inlaid with colored glass and semiprecious stones (including obsidian, quartz, and lapis lazuli), the mask is 21 in. tall by 15.5 in. wide and includes representations of the goddesses Nekhbet (the vulture) and Wadjet (the cobra), the nemes (the striped head cloth of the pharaohs) and the traditional false beard. The mask was designed to ensure that the pharaoh’s soul would recognize his body and return to allow his resurrection.

Myron: The Discus Thrower (Palombara Discobolus) (460-450 BCE)
Museo Nazionale Romano, Rome
Discobolus
The Discobolus (also known as The Discus Thrower) was a bronze mid-5th Century BCE Greek sculpture by Myron. The original is lost and is known only by Roman copies, the most famous of which is the 5.1 ft. tall Palombara Discobolus, which dates from the 1st Century CE and was discovered in 1781 (see image above). Adolf Hitler bought it in 1938 and brought it to Munich.  It was returned to Italy in 1948.  The statue is known for its depiction of athletic energy and a well-proportioned body as well as rhythmos, a quality of harmony and balance. According to one critic, Myron creates a sense of balance and order by having the discus thrower’s arms and back create two completely congruous intersecting arcs. On some copies of the statue, the head has been improperly restored in a position facing down instead of looking back toward the discus.

Phidias (attrib.): Parthenon Frieze (c. 443-438 BCE) British Museum, London, UK; Athens, Greece

Parthenon-frieze-bbparthenon frieze
The Parthenon Frieze is a low-relief marble sculpture that originally decorated the upper portion of the interior of the Parthenon, a temple on the Acropolis in Athens dedicated to Athena.  According to Plutarch, Phidias oversaw the work, which consisted of 114 marble blocks, each 3.3 feet high, totaling 524 feet in length, 80% of which remains. There are two parallel lines of figures with 378 gods and humans, including all the Attic tribes, and 245 animals. The first image above depicts the deities Poseidon, Apollo and Artemis. Scholars disagree about whether the scene depicted in the frieze is contemporary, historical or allegorical.  According to one theory, the frieze represents the Panathenaic Procession, an annual religious event. Large portions of the frieze were damaged or destroyed by Venetian bombing in 1687, when the Ottomans used the Parthenon as a gunpowder magazine.  In a controversial series of events, Thomas Bruce, 7th Earl of Elgin, removed much of the frieze between 1801 and 1812; as a result, a large portion of the Parthenon frieze is now in the British Museum as part of the Elgin Marbles. Although many have argued for the return of the frieze to Athens, where portions of it remain, most experts have concluded that the UK acquired it legally.

Unknown Artists: Pergamon Altar Frieze (c. 180 BCE) Pergamon Museum, Berlin
pergamon altarpergamon altarThe Pergamon Altar Frieze is carved in high relief around the base of the Pergamon altar, a massive structure constructed in the ancient city of Pergamon in Asia Minor (now Turkey) during the reign of King Eumenes II in the 2nd Century BCE. The altar and its friezes are among the most significant works of Hellenistic art.  The largest frieze (made of Proconnesian marble and measuring 7.5 ft. tall by 370.7 ft. long) depicts the Gigantomachy, a battle between the Giants and the gods of Olympus. The first image above shows Hecate fighting Klytios, on the left, and Artemis fighting Otos, on the right. The second image shows Athena in battle. Another, smaller frieze on the inner court walls shows scenes from the life of Telephus, legendary founder of Pergamon. The altar and friezes were excavated by Carl Humann between 1878 and 1886. By arrangement with the Turkish government, he brought them to Germany, where the various fragments were restored and put on display in the Pergamon Museum in Berlin.

Agesander, Athenodoros & PolydorusLaocoön and His Sons (c. 42-19 BCE)  Museo Pio Clementino, Vatican City

    laocoon - earlier pose
According to Pliny the Elder, he observed a marble statue of Laocoön and His Sons in the home of the future emperor Titus between 70 and 79 CE that was made by Agesander, Athenodoros and Polydoros, three sculptors from the Greek island of Rhodes.  In 1506, a marble statue that seemed to match the one described by Pliny was discovered in a Roman vineyard beneath the remains of the Baths of Titus. The group, which measures 6.8 ft. tall, 5.3 ft. wide and 3.7 ft. deep, shows Trojan priest Laocoön and his sons Antiphantes and Thymbraeus being attacked by sea serpents, as related in several Greek myths and the Aeneid, in punishment by pro-Greek gods for uncovering the secret of the Trojan Horse. The style is considered Hellenistic “Pergamene baroque” and a figure in the Pergamon Altar Frieze bears a striking similarity to the figure of Laocoön here. The sculpture had an enormous influence on the Renaissance artists who saw it, particularly in the way it depicted the suffering of the characters (see second image). Scholars disagree about the date of the piece.  Some believe it is a marble copy dating to 14-37 CE of a bronze original from c. 150-140 BCE. Others believe it is an original work created some time between 50 BCE and 68 CE. Based on an unscientific survey of websites, the majority view is that it is an original sculpture made between 42 and 19 BCE. Laocoön and His Sons was purchased by the Vatican and is now at the Museo Pio-Clementino in Rome. Various restorations have been proposed over the centuries, but most changes have not been permanent. The right arms of the figures, which were missing, were replaced by replicas for certain periods. In 1540, for example, the Vatican gave Laocoön a new right arm that extended upward. In 1906, Ludwig Pollak discovered part of a marble arm in a Roman builder’s yard near the spot where the original statue was found. He gave it to the Vatican. In 1957, the Vatican’s experts finally decided that the arm, which was bent, belonged to Laocoön, so it replaced the extended arm that had been added in 1540 (see second image above showing previous pose with extended arm).

Eadfrith of LindisfarneLindisfarne Gospels (c. 700-715) British Museum, London
lindisfarne carpet pageLindesfarne
The illuminated manuscript known as the Lindisfarne Gospels was produced in a monastery on Lindisfarne (also known as Holy Island) off the coast of Northumberland in the UK. Eadfrith, who was Bishop of Lindisfarne from 698 until his death in 721, is presumed to be the artist. The book, which measures 14.4 inches high and 10.8 inches wide, was originally encased in a leather binding covered with jewels and precious metals made by Billfrith the Anchorite, but this treasure was looted by the Vikings sometime after their first raid in 793. The original Latin text is written using insular majuscule script and the art is considered an early and prime example of the insular or Hiberno-Saxon art of the British Isles in the post-Roman period. In the 10th Century, Aldred, Provost of Chester-le-Street, inserted a word-for-word Old English translation between the lines of the Latin text and a short history of the book, noting that it was made in honor of 7th Century St. Cuthbert, an earlier Bishop of Lindisfarne.  The style of the illuminations incorporates Christian and pre-Christian imagery, including Celtic, Germanic and Irish artistic traditions. Each Gospel is introduced by a portrait of the evangelist – the portrait page of St. Matthew is shown in the first image above. St. Matthew’s cross-carpet page (folio 26v), with its cross surrounded by swirling knots and spirals, is shown in the second image above.  The Lindisfarne Gospels is now located in the British Library in London.

Masaccio (Tommaso di Ser Giovanni di Simone): The Holy Trinity (1428) Santa Maria Novella, Florence
     trinity       
Measuring 21.9 ft. tall by 10.4 ft. wide, Masaccio’s Holy Trinity fresco sends a very simple message: accept the saving grace of the Christian God, or spend eternity in darkness.  For artists, however, the work sent a different message, because it demonstrated the ways in which they could use Brunelleschi’s rules of perspective to create images that tricked the eye (tromp l’oeil) into seeing depth on a flat surface. When Renaissance artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari was commissioned in the mid-1500s to renovate the chapel in Florence’s Santa Maria Novella church, where the Holy Trinity was painted, he constructed a new screen and altar directly in front of the fresco to both hide it and prevent its destruction. Masaccio’s masterpiece was not revealed again until another round of renovations in 1860. Even then, the lower portion of the fresco depicting the skeleton and tomb was not reunited with the upper portion until 1952. The first image shows the entire fresco with the tomb below; the second image shows the upper portion only.

Donatello (Donato di Niccolò di Betto Bardi): David (c. 1435-1440) Museo Nazionale del
Bargello, Florence
  
Early Renaissance Italian artist Donatello made two statues of the Biblical David. The second sculpture, which is the more highly regarded of the two, shows the young hero, having slain Goliath, standing with his foot on the giant’s head (see second image, above), and carrying Goliath’s immense sword (see first image, above). Standing 6.2 ft. tall, Donatello’s David is the first unsupported bronze statue of the Renaissance and the first freestanding nude male sculpture in any medium since Greek and Roman times. David was considered a symbol of Florence, and the Medici family commissioned the statue for their palace courtyard as a political statement about their place in the Florentine power structure. While the statue’s beauty is undisputed, some have commented on its departures from traditional forms. Some find the boy’s nudity odd, given his hat and boots.  Some find the figure too effeminate or androgynous. Others claim that the very aspects some find ‘odd’ are intended to demonstrate that David’s victory over Goliath was not a result of strength, but of God’s will. Some scholars believe Donatello’s loving attention to the nude male form indicates that he was homosexual. The David is now in the Museo Nazionale del Bargello in Florence.

Correggio (Antonio Allegri da Correggio): Jupiter and Io (c. 1530-1532)
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna
   Correggio_The_Abduction_of_Ganymede
leda-and-the-swan   danae
Jupiter and Io is a voluptuous late Renaissance oil painting by Italian artist Correggio illustrating a story from Ovid’s Metamorphoses in which Jupiter, the king of the gods, takes on the shape of a smoky gray cloud to seduce Io, a mortal river nymph (see first image above).  Jupiter and Io was one of a series of paintings on the subject of The Loves of Jupiter, as related in the Metamorphoses, that was commissioned by Federico II Gonzaga, Duke of Mantua. The series of paintings was initially intended for a private room in the Duke’s palace, but they were given instead to the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V during a visit to Mantua. Other paintings in the series include: Ganymede Abducted by the Eagle (1531-1532) (see second image above); Leda with the Swan (1531-1532) (see third image above) and Danaë (c. 1531) (see fourth image above),   Jupiter and Io, the most highly regarded painting in the series, has a dreamlike sensuality. Jupiter’s face emerges from the cloud to give Io a kiss on the cheek, while Io, her substantial body twisted in the throes of ecstasy, pulls Jupiter’s cloud-engulfed hand closer around her waist. Jupiter and Io was made with oils on a canvas measuring 5.4 feet tall by 2.3 feet wide and is now in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna.

Rembrandt (Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn): The Jewish Bride (1667)
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
Rembrandt_-_The_Jewish_Bride 2
The identity of the subjects of Dutch artist Rembrandt’s The Jewish Bride is unknown – it is not even clear that they are Jewish. The current title arose from a now-debunked 19th Century theory that the painting showed a Jewish father giving his daughter a necklace on her wedding day. A number of scholars believe the figures represent Old Testament couple Isaac and Rebekah, either as authentic Biblical figures or as part of a contemporary tradition in which men and women (and couples) had their portraits painted while dressed as figures from history or the Bible. Rembrandt uses his mature technique here, which involved smearing thick layers of paint on the canvas to bring out texture. Scholars note that his overall composition, use of color and shading all contribute to the effect of capturing an intimate moment between husband and wife.  The Jewish Bride, made with oils on a canvas measuring 4 ft. tall by 5.5. ft. wide, is now located at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam.

Giovanni Battista Tiepolo: Frescoes, Würzburg Residence (1750-1753) Würzburg, Germany
tiepolo wurzburgtiepolo apollo    tiepolo africa
tiepolo allegorical ceiling    tiepolo wedding 
In 1750, in response to a commission from Karl Philipp von Greiffenklau, the Prince-Bishop of Würzburg, Germany, Venetian painter Giovanni Battista Tiepolo and his sons traveled from Italy to paint frescoes on the walls and ceilings of the Würzburg Residence, the palace of the Prince-Bishops of what was then the episcopal principality of Würzburg, now a city in the German state of Bavaria.  Considered the last great Venetian painter, Tiepolo painted in the Baroque style with hints of the coming Rococo.  Critics use the term sprezzatura to describe the way that Tiepolo used precise rendering of images, dramatic poses and tension-creating color schemes to keep the pictures engaging, while at the same time combining these characteristics with a soft, romantic quality that eases tension without sacrificing liveliness.  Tiepolo’s most celebrated fresco, Apollo and the Four Continents (also known as The Allegory of the Planets and the Continents), covers the vault over the main staircase and measures 62 ft. by 100 ft., covering an area of 7,287 square feet (see first image above).  The fresco depicts Apollo and other deities in the center (see second image, above), surrounded by the continents of Europe, America, Asia and Africa (see third image above), each with representative landscapes, animals and a female allegorical figure. In the Imperial Hall, Tiepolo painted the allegorical Apollo Presenting Beatrice of Burgundy to Frederick Barbarossa on the ceiling (see fourth image above) as well as two historical events on the walls: the Marriage of Emperor Frederick to Beatrice (see fifth image above) and the Investiture of Herold as Duke of Franconia, each of which measures 13 ft. high and 16.4 ft. wide. Scholars acknowledge that the frescoes are the pinnacle of Tiepolo’s career and a high point of 18th Century artistic achievement.

Jean-Honoré FragonardThe Swing (1767) Wallace Collection, London

The original title, The Happy Accidents of the Swing, better illustrates the playful attitude of this iconic Rococo painting, Fragonard’s best-known work. In a creamy pastel pink and green paradise, an elderly man (the libertine nobleman who commissioned the painting asked for a Bishop, but Fragonard refused to go that far), accompanied by two cherubim, pushes a young lady (possibly his wife) on a swing. She impetuously kicks off her shoe in Cupid’s direction, while giving her young lover, hiding below in the foliage, a scandalous peek beneath her dress at her legs. The frivolous nature of this and similar works of the time led to a campaign by Enlightenment philosophers for serious art showing man’s nobility.  Despite these criticisms, Fragonard was a highly regarded artist among the French aristocracy, but fell out of favor when revolution arrived in 1789. The Swing, made with oils on a canvas measuring 2.6 ft. tall by 2.1 ft. wide, is now in the Wallace Collection in London. Random Trivia: The cover art of Little Feat’s album Sailin’ Shoes pays homage to The Swing.

Jacques-Louis DavidDeath of Marat (1793) Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, Brussels
   
Painter Jacques-Louis David and journalist Jean-Paul Marat were both ardent supporters of the French Revolution; both were members of the Jacobins and the Montagnards, radical groups opposed to the more conservative Girondists. On July 13, 1793, Girondist Charlotte Corday lied to gain access to Marat’s room, where he was bathing in oatmeal for his eczema condition, and stabbed him to death. The government asked David to paint Marat’s portrait. The result is an idealized work, made with oils on a canvas measuring 5.4 ft. tall by 4.2 ft. wide, depicting the dying Marat as a martyr of the Revolution, holding Corday’s false petition in his hand. As such, it echoes many paintings of Christian martyrs, particularly the various depictions of Christ’s descent from the Cross. The elements combine to make Death of Marat a powerful blend of outrage and compassion. The painting was praised until the fall of Robespierre and the end of the Reign of Terror, after which David himself became a target of the Thermidorian Reaction.  The painting was only rediscovered in the mid-19th Century. Death of Marat is now located at the Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium in Brussels. The second image is Marat (Sebastião) (2008) by Brazilian artist Vic Muniz’s Pictures of Garbage series. The work, made entirely from recycled garbage, is a portrait of a man who earns his living by finding resellable material in a huge garbage dump.

Katsushika Hokusai: Thirty-Six Views of Mt. Fuji – No. 1: The Great Wave off Kanagawa (1830-1833)  Various museums
The_Great_Wave_off_Kanagawa 2Hokusai - The_coast_of_seven_leages_in_Kamakura   hokusai Red_Fuji_southern_wind_clear_morning
Between 1826 and 1833, Japanese artist Katsushika Hokusai created 46 different color woodblock prints depicting Mount Fuji in a variety of different contexts. The prints belong to the artistic genre of ukiyo-e, or ‘pictures of the floating world.’ The first 36 prints were published in 1831 under the title Thirty-Six Views of Mount Fuji. They were so popular that Hokusai printed 10 additional views in the following years. The most famous of the original 36 prints is The Great Wave off Kanagawa (also known as The Great Wave off the Coast of Kanagawa and literally translated as Off Kanagawa, the Underside of a Wave), shown above. It shows three boats being threatened by a large wave, while Mt. Fuji is a relatively small figure in the distance. The boats pictured are oshiokuri-bune, fast boats used to transport live fish to market. Each boat has eight rowers and two other passengers. Based on the typical size of such boats and Hokusai’s reduction of the vertical scale by 30%, scholars have estimated the height of the wave to be 32-39 feet.  Copies of the print, each of which measures 10.1 in. tall by 14.9 in. wide, can be found in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, the British Museum in London, the Art Institute of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois, the Guimet Museum in Paris, and the National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne, Australia, among others. Although none of the other prints has attained the fame of The Great Wave off Kanagawa, they are all quite remarkable. Three other prints from the series are shown above:  (2) No. 6: The Coast of Seven Leagues in Kamakura; and (3) No. 2: South Wind, Clear Sky (also known as Red Fuji).

Pierre-Auguste Renoir: Dance at Le Moulin de la Galette (1876) Musée d’Orsay, Paris
Le_Moulin_de_la_Galette
French Impressionist Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Bal du moulin de la Galette paints a portrait of a Sunday afternoon at a popular outdoor café and dance hall in Montmartre, then a rural hilltop village an hour’s walk from Paris.  The Moulin de la Galette, named after the brown bread made from the flour ground by its historic windmill, was a weekend destination for working men and women, as well as writers and artists. They came dressed in their best clothes to eat galettes, drink, dance and gaze down on Paris from a scenic overlook. Like all the Impressionists, Renoir liked to paint scenes of everyday life, but no Impressionist had previously shown average people amusing themselves on such a large canvas (4.3 ft. tall by 5.7 ft. wide), thereby giving an apparently trivial subject heightened significance.  Like all Impressionists, Renoir liked to study the effects of light: here, he paints the sunlight filtering through the acacia trees and mixing with lamplight to create a dappled patchwork of bright patches and shadows.  Critics then and now marvel at the way Renoir makes the light seem to flicker and dance.  Scholars also comment on Renoir’s effective use of bright colors – there is not a touch of black in the canvas – and the resulting tone of carefree celebration. Note that, although Remoir appears to depict a typical crowd at the Moulin, he loaded the canvas with portraits of his friends, as well as a few professional models. One of those friends, writer Georges Rivière (pictured at the table in the foreground), in his review of the 1877 Impressionist Exhibition, described Bal du Moulin de la Galette (also known as Dance at Le Moulin de la Galette and The Ball at the Moulin de la Galette) as a “page of history, a precious and strictly accurate portrayal of Parisian life.”  The work, which was made with oils on canvas, is now in the  Musée d’Orsay in Paris. Renoir painted a second, smaller version of the painting (measuring 2.5 ft. tall by 3.7 ft. wide) that is in a private collection; it was purchased at auction for $78 million in 1990.

Auguste Rodin: The Thinker (28 full-size casts) (1880) University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky (1904); National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo (1904); Legion of Honor, San Francisco (1904); Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit, Michigan (1904); Ny Carlsberg Glyptothek, Copenhagen (1904); Musée Rodin, Paris (1906); Prince Eugen Museum, Waldemarsudde, Sweden (1908)
The_Thinker,_Auguste_Rodin
The sculpture now known as The Thinker originated as a small part of a large commission for the entrance of a new art museum that eventually became The Gates of Hell. For that project, French sculptor Auguste Rodin planned to create a series of figures based on Dante’s Divine Comedy, including Dante himself, The Poet, who would be depicted thinking about and planning his masterpiece.  In about 1880, Rodin sculpted a small plaster statue in of The Poet, a sitting figure with his head resting on the fist of a bended arm, which would occupy a prominent place in the center of the top register of The Gates of Hell. Because The Poet would be seen from below, Rodin made the arms and shoulders larger than anatomy required. At some point, Rodin decided The Poet should have a life of its own, outside The Gates of Hell. He reworked the figure, removed its robes, making it a nude, and renamed it The Thinker, in part because of its resemblance to a Michelangelo work with that nickname. Rodin eventually made a larger plaster version, which he first exhibited in 1888.  In 1902, Rodin supervised the first of a number of full-size bronze casts, which now sits in front of Grawemeyer Hall at the University of Louisville in Kentucky. Over the years, 28 bronze and plaster casts have been made, although fewer than 10 were completed before Rodin’s death in 1917.  The casts are scattered in museums and universities around the globe. Each full-sized cast of The Thinker is 6.2 ft. tall, 3.2 ft. wide and 4.6 ft. deep. The size of the plinth beneath the statue is a matter up to the owner’s discretion.

Paul CézanneThe Large Bathers (1898-1906) Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

French painter Paul Cézanne’s The Large Bathers (also known as The Bathers or Les Grandes Baigneuses) is the last and the largest in a series of ‘bathers’ paintings he created around the turn of the century. Cézanne disliked labels and movements, and this painting shows why. The grouping of nudes and triangular structure hearken back to Renaissance forms and themes – the subject of Diana bathing with her maidens may have been an inspiration – but the details of the figures are modern: strangely-posed, faceless, lacking sensuality, in some cases only half-drawn – and the scene in the distance appears to be contemporary, not mythological. The bowing trees create a stage on which the women may perform, yet, as noted by curator Joseph Rishel, despite the motion and activity, “there is a profound sense of eternal calm and resolution.”  Cézanne based the nude figures on his drawings or other paintings, not live models, which only adds to the flatness of the figures, anticipating the forms of Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon a year later. Scholars generally agree that Cézanne had not finished the painting at the time of his death in 1906, although some believe that its unfinished state adds to its exalted and serene quality. The Large Bathers was made with oils on a canvas measuring 8 ft. tall by 7 ft. wide and is now located in the Philadelphia Museum of Art in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Gustav KlimtThe Kiss (1908-1909) Österreichische Galerie Belvedere, Vienna

Measuring nearly 6 feet square, Austrian Symbolist Gustav Klimt’s The Kiss, also known as Lovers, was painted on canvas using oil paints with applied layers of gold leaf. Made during Klimt’s Golden Period, The Kiss is a prime example of the Viennese Art Nouveau style, while also incorporating elements of the Arts and Crafts movement. The use of gold and the overall flatness of the painting (with the exception of the area around the faces) hearkens back to the Christian iconography in Medieval and Byzantine art, such as the mosaics of San Vitale in Ravenna that inspired Klimt. Also, both figures are crowned with halo-like bands of leaves (the man) and flowers (the woman), further creating the sense of the eternal.  The Kiss is located in the Österreichische Galerie Belvedere in Vienna.

Claude Monet (Oscar-Claude Monet): Water Lilies (Les Nymphéas) (1914-1926) Musée de l’Orangerie, Paris
The_Water_Lilies_-_The_Clouds
monet water liliesMonet_-_The_Water_Lilies_-_Setting_Sun
During the last 30 years of his life, French Impressionist painter Claude Monet created approximately 250 paintings of the water lilies in the ponds of his home in Giverny, France. As a group, the paintings are called Les Nymphéas or The Water Lilies, although many pieces have individual titles.  The 250 paintings are distributed in museums all over the world.  Monet donated eight of his final Water Lily oils-on-canvas murals – including some of the most abstract – to the French government; they are displayed in specially-designed oval rooms in the Musée de l’Orangerie in Paris, where the giant canvases curve to allow the viewer to feel completely immersed in them.  Each mural is 6.5 ft. tall; if lined up, they would span 298.5 feet. Each painting depicts a specific place in the gardens at a specific time; the flat surface of the water fills the canvas so we see no ground, no horizon line and no sky (although the sun, clouds and sky are reflected in the water, as are the trees and vines along the banks of the ponds).  The figures are simplified and the painting is sometimes rough, with multiple layers of paint and obvious brushstrokes.  Monet encounters the two-dimensions of the canvas directly in a way that anticipates the Action Painters of the 1950s.  The images above show all or part of three of the Orangerie paintings: (1) The Water Lilies – The Clouds, three panels (1920-1926); (2) The Water Lilies – Morning with Willows (The Morning Willows), three panels (1918-1926); and (3) The Water Lilies – Setting Sun, single panel, (1920-1926).

Robert SmithsonSpiral Jetty (1970) Great Salt Lake, Utah
Spiral-jettyspiral jetty
Spiral Jetty is a site-specific earthwork sculpture that American artist Robert Smithson constructed on the northeastern short of the Great Salt Lake in Utah, a site selected because of the presence of salt-tolerant bacteria and algae that turn the water a blood-red color, and also because it was far from the galleries and museums of the New York art world. The environmental sculpture, which slowly changes over time, consists of a counterclockwise coil 1,500 feet long and 15 feet wide that juts into the lake. In its immensity, the piece hearkens back to the ancient monuments of prehistoric times.  Construction required moving 6,650 tons of rock and earth, and took six days. Spiral Jetty may be visible or submerged depending on the lake’s water level. The photo in the first image shown above was taken in April 2005 when the sculpture became visible again after three decades under water. The photo in the second image above was taken in 2011. Smithson, who died in 1973, also made a film documenting the project, also called Spiral Jetty (1970).

6 Lists
Unknown Artist: Venus of Willendorf (28,000-25,000 BCE) Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna
Venus_of_Willendorf   The Venus of Willendorf figurine.
During the Upper Paleolithic era (c. 28,000-18,000 BCE), the Gravettian culture flourished in parts of Europe. The culture is known for its many bone, stone, or clay statuettes of women, usually with large breasts, bellies, thighs, hips and buttocks, that are referred to as Venus figurines, even though they predate the Greco-Roman Venus mythology by many thousands of years.  Many of the figurines are either headless or faceless. The 4.25 in. tall carved limestone figurine known as the Venus of Willendorf (see images above) was found in 1908 at a Paleolithic site in the Danube valley of Austria, near the town of Willendorf. The figure has the exaggerated features of the typical Venus figurine.  It has no face, only streaks that may be hair, and no feet, so it could not stand by itself. There are traces of red ochre on the figurine, indicating it was once painted. The type of limestone used was not found locally, indicating the existence of a trade network. The purpose of the Venus of Willendorf and other Venus figurines is debated, but the sculptor’s emphasis on the female body’s sexual and childbearing characteristics has led many to conclude that this and other such figurines were fertility goddesses or otherwise played a role in fertility rituals.

Unknown Artists: Cave Paintings, Lascaux Caves (c. 15,000-13,000 BCE) Montignac, France
lascaux 2
Lascaux_painting   Cave Painting.
During the Upper Paleolithic period between 17,000 and 15,000 years ago, humans painted almost 2000 figures in the Lascaux Caves in southwestern France.  Most of the paintings depict large grazing animals such as deer and horses (see third image, above) using various mineral pigments, particularly black and red. There is one human figure (see first image above) and a number of abstract or geometric designs. The Great Hall of the Bulls (see second image above) includes a 17-ft wide black bull or auroch, the largest painted figure in cave art. Many theories have been proposed for the purpose of the paintings, including aiding in religious ceremonies, improving hunting success or documenting past hunts. Some scholars believe there are astronomical charts incorporated in the designs. The caves were discovered in 1940 by 18-year-old Marcel Ravidat and opened to the public in 1948. Due to the damage caused by carbon dioxide from 1,200 visitors per day, the caves were closed to the public in 1963. Since 1998, the art has been threatened by various types of fungus, including black mold.

Unknown Artist: Ashurbanipal Hunting Lions (c. 645-635 BCE) British Museum, London
lion hunt
injured lion
Ashurbanipal was the last powerful king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. He ruled from 668 until his death in about 627 BCE.  The empire collapsed less than 20 years later. Since the mid-10th Century BCE, the Assyrians had controlled a huge portion of the Middle East, including all or part of 13 modern nations. Ashurbanipal is referred to in the Hebrew Book of Ezra as Asenappar, and some say he is the figure known elsewhere as Sardanapalus. His capital, Nineveh, located along the Tigris River in what is now northern Iraq, was destroyed by Assyria’s enemies in 612 BCE. When British archaeologists excavated the ruins of Nineveh in 1853, they discovered an elaborate frieze from the North Palace depicting the king hunting and killing lions (in one case in hand-to-paw combat, see first image above), as well as a banquet celebrating a military victory.  Showing the king conquering lions not only documented his sporting activities, but also symbolized his power to protect his people from their enemies. The sculptor also shows true sympathy for the noble beasts as they struggle to fight back, even when pierced by multiple arrows (see second image above). The relief sculptures, which are known as Ashurbanipal Hunting Lions, the Lion Hunts of Ashurbanipal, or simply the Lion Hunt Frieze, are now in the British Museum in London.

Unknown Artist: Winged Victory of Samothrace (Nike of Samothrace) (c. 200-190 BCE) Musée du Louvre, Paris
Nike of Samothrace
Created in Greece during the Hellenistic period, a severely damaged depiction of the goddess Nike, or Victory, standing 8 ft. tall, was discovered in 1863 on the island of Samothrace, now a part of Greece but then belonging to the Ottoman Empire. The head and arms have never been found, but portions of the right hand were located and are on display in a separate case in the Louvre in Paris. Only the left wing is original; the right wing is a symmetrically identical version of the left, made of plaster. Scholars praise the statue for its combination of motion and stillness, and the realistic rendering of the drapery. According to one theory, the sculpture was meant to honor a sea battle and represents the goddess as she descends from the sky, hand cupped to her mouth, ready to deliver a victory shout to the fleet.

Unknown Artist: Frescoes, Villa of the Mysteries (c. 60-40 BCE) near Pompeii, Italy
Villa of the mysteries
The Villa of the Mysteries is a Roman villa located near the ruins of Pompeii in southern Italy. The eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in 79 CE covered it with many feet of volcanic ash and tufa, preserving it for future generations. When the villa was excavated in 1909, a remarkable series of frescoes was discovered in the triclinium, or formal dining room. The frescoes are nearly 10 feet tall and run around the four walls of the room for a total of 56 feet. The meaning of the frescoes is subject to debate: some scholars believe they depict the initiation of a young woman into a Dionysian cult; others say they represent marriage rituals.

Apollodorus of Damascus (attrib.): Trajan’s Column (113 CE) Rome, Italy
    Detail of Trajan's Column.
Trajan’s Column was built to celebrate Roman Emperor Trajan’s victories over the Dacians in 101-102 CE and 105-106 CE.  The column itself, which consists of 20 marble drums, each 11 feet in diameter, is 98 feet tall; with the pedestal included, it rises 125 feet from the ground (see first image above). A bas relief showing the events of the Dacian Wars spirals around the column for a total of 625 feet, with nearly 2,500 figures depicted, including 59 representations of Trajan himself with his troops (see second image above). A spiral staircase inside the column leads to an observation deck.  In antiquity, a statue of Trajan topped the column, but it disappeared during the Middle Ages. Pope Sixtus V placed a bronze statue of St. Peter atop the column in 1587.

Unknown Artists: Bayeux Tapestry (c. 1075) Centre Guillaume le Conquerant, Bayeux, France
bayeux tapestryA scene from the Bayeaux Tapestry.
Not a true tapestry, the Bayeux Tapestry is an embroidered cloth measuring 224 ft. long by 1.6 ft. tall, contains an illustrated narrative of the Norman Conquest of England and events leading up to it. The tapestry consists of nine linen panels with fifty scenes, each with a caption in Latin, embroidered with colored woolen yarns on a linen cloth. The final portion has been lost. Although legend attributes the tapestry to French artists, scholars now believe that skilled Anglo-Saxon seamsters made the work in England in the 1070s. It was probably commissioned by William the Conqueror’s half-brother Bishop Odo, Earl of Kent and founder of the Bayeux Cathedral in Normandy, where the tapestry was first mentioned in a 1476 inventory. In addition to historical scenes involving William, Duke of Normandy, Harold, Earl of Wessex (later King) and King Edward the Confessor, the tapestry includes the first depiction of a harrow, a newly-invented farm implement, and the first image of Halley’s Comet, which appeared in March/April 1066. The images above show: (1) William the Conqueror lays siege to Conan at Dinan and (2) Harold crossing the Channel to Normandy. A Victorian replica of the tapestry, with explanatory narrative, may be viewed online HERE.

Unknown Artists: Relief Sculptures, Chartres Cathedral (c. 1145-1220) Chartres, France
chartres cathedral royal portalchartres north transept
chartres   CHARTRES CATHEDRAL VISITATION
Chartres Cathedral (also known as Cathedral Basilica of Our Lady of Chartres) is a Roman Catholic cathedral located in Chartres, France. Begun in the Romanesque style in 1145, the cathedral was reconstructed in the French Gothic style after an 1194 fire, with most of the work completed between 1194 and 1220.  Religious sculptures and carvings decorate the west, north and south entrances (also called portals or porches), with each portal’s reliefs addressing a separate theological subject. The carvings of the west entrance, known as the Royal Portals (portions of which may have survived from the pre-1194 structure), focus on the nature of Jesus. The north entrance celebrates the Old Testament and Christ’s immediate ancestors, while the south entrance relates the history of the Catholic Church since Christ’s death. During the French Revolution, anti-clerical protesters destroyed some of the sculptures on the north porch, before being stopped by local townspeople; a plan by Revolutionaries to dynamite the cathedral was derailed by an architect who noted the resulting rubble would block the streets for months. The images of Chartres’ relief sculptures shown above are: (1) the central tympanum of the Royal Portal, on the west façade, showing Christ in majesty at the Second Coming/Last Judgment; (2) the tympanum of the central portal of the north transept, depicting the Coronation of the Virgin (Glorification of Mary) and other scenes; (3) detail from the bases of three door jamb statues; and (4) door jamb statues showing the Visitation.

Andrei RublevThe Holy Trinity Icon (Trinity) (1408-1425) Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow

Russian artist Andrei Rublev painted religious icons, which differ from other paintings of religious subjects in that they are intended to convey the inner spiritual meaning of the subject matter and serve as a focus of worship. Rublev, who was canonized as a saint in the Russian Orthodox Church, is best known for the Holy Trinity Icon, which depicts the three angels who appeared to Abraham at Mamre, as related in the Book of Genesis. Christian tradition connects the angels with the three persons of the Christian trinity (from left to right, God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit). Rublev used tempera to paint the icon, which measures 4.6 ft. tall and 3.75 ft. wide and contains several layers of symbolism. Like many older icons, there has been considerable damage, repainting and other alteration over the years with attempts at restoration beginning in the 20th Century. The Holy Trinity Icon, also known simply as Trinity, is now at the State Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow.

Lorenzo Ghiberti: The Gates of Paradise (East Doors of Florence Baptistery) (1425-1452) Baptistery, Florence

gates of paradise 2Ghiberti
The Gates of Paradise is the name coined by Michelangelo for the gilded bronze relief sculptures carved by Italian artist Lorenzo Ghiberti for the east doors of the Florence Baptistery.  This was the second set of door panels carved by Ghiberti for the building.  In 1401, at the age of 23, he won a contest to create 28 panels with scenes from the New Testament for what are now the north doors, a project he finished in 1423. In 1425, Ghiberti received a commission to create 10 panels with scenes from the Old Testament for the east doors. This project, which involved a dangerous gilding process, took him 27 years to finish. The second set of doors incorporates the newly discovered rules of perspective and the scenes have a naturalism that is absent from the north door reliefs.  The doors are 17 ft. tall, and each panel is 2.6 ft square (see first image above). Between the panels, narrow borders contain 20 full-length portraits and 24 heads in roundels of prophets and evangelists, including a Ghiberti roundel self-portrait (see border in third image; roundel self-portrait in fourth image). In 1990, the panels in the Baptistery doors were removed and replaced by replicas in order to protect the originals from weather damage.  Serious conservation efforts had begun in 1966 after a flood dislodged six of the panels. The originals were brought to the Museo dell’Opera del Duomo, where they recently underwent a 27-year-long restoration and cleaning (see third image above, showing Solomon and the Queen Sheba). Three of the restored panels toured the U.S. in 2007-2008, including Adam and Eve (see second image above).

Andrea Mantegna: Frescoes, Camera degli Sposi (1465-1474) Castello San Giorgio, Mantua, Italy

Andrea_Mantegna camera degli sposi 2
In the mid-1400s, Ludovico III Gonzaga commissioned Andrea Mantegna to paint frescoes in the Camera degli Sposi, or bridal chamber, of the Ducal Palace in Mantua, Italy. The major frescoes include a court scene on the north wall, a meeting scene on the north wall, and an oculus on the ceiling (see first image above). Each fresco creates the trompe-d’oeil illusion of additional space beyond the wall or ceiling: the ceiling oculus, for example, appears to open into the sky above, with various characters peering over the edge down into the room (see second image above). It is one of the first di sotto in sù ceiling paintings. The meeting and court scenes show the patron with friends, family and dignitaries. The frescoes remain in the bridal chamber in the northeast tower of the Castle of San Giorgio in Mantua.

Leonardo da Vinci
Virgin of the Rocks (I) (1483-1486) Musée du Louvre, Paris
      
For reasons that are still unclear (although there are plenty of theories), Leonardo da Vinci painted two nearly identical versions of the Virgin of the Rocks. Virgin of the Rocks I, which is now in the Louvre in Paris, was probably painted first and is considered the primary version (see image above). Painted with oils on wood panel, it was later transferred to a canvas measuring 6.5 ft. tall by 4 ft. wide. The painting shows the Madonna, the young Jesus, the young John the Baptist and an angel. The central event of the painting is John’s adoration of Jesus, who makes the sign of Benediction in return. Two paintings of angels playing musical instruments are associated with the work, although they are believed to be painted by Leonardo’s assistants (see second and third images above); all three were commissioned for an altarpiece by the Confraternity of the Immaculate Conception in Milan. Virgin of the Rocks is an excellent example of the sfumato painting technique, which Leonardo described as “without lines or borders, in the manner of smoke or beyond the focus plane.” It also has the triangular composition that Leonardo often used. Consistent with Leonardo’s polymath interests, scholars have determined that the geological and botanical details of the painting are scientifically accurate.

Leonardo da Vinci: Lady with an Ermine (c. 1490) Czartorski Collection, Krakow, Poland

Leonardo da Vinci painted Lady with an Ermine, measuring 21 in. tall by 15 in. wide, using oil paints, which had only recently been introduced to Italy. The subject of the three-quarter portrait is Cecilia Galleriani, the 16-year-old mistress of Leonardo’s employer, Ludovico Sforza. Miss Galleriani’s simple clothes make it clear that she is not an aristocrat. The ermine symbolizes purity, for legend had it that it would rather die than dirty its white coat. As with many of da Vinci’s paintings, the painting follows a spiraling pyramid compositional structure. It is also notable for the detailed attention the painter paid to the subject’s hand, reflecting Leonardo’s interest in anatomy. Lady with an Ermine is located in the Czartoryski Museum in Kraków, Poland.

Unknown Artist: Statue of Coatlicue (c. 1300-1500) Museo Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City
coatlicue   Coatlicue_backside
In Aztec mythology, Coatlicue (“The One with the Skirt of Serpents”) is the goddess who gave birth to the moon, the stars and the gods Quetzalcoatl, Xoloti and Huitzilopochtli. She is also the patron goddess of women who die in childbirth. The Statue of Coatlicue, which was made between 1300 and 1500, is made of andesite and stands 8.9 ft. tall (see front and rear of statue in first and second images, above). The statue depicts a myth in which Coatlicue became pregnant after picking up a ball of feathers and her children, fearing illicit sexual behavior, decapitated her, causing her to give birth to a god and also causing blood to gush from her neck in the form of two serpents. She wears a necklace of human skulls and hearts and a skirt made of snakes. Europeans discovered the statue during a building project in Mexico City in 1790; they found it gruesome but casts were made to show at exhibitions. When Mexican Indians began paying tribute to the statue, the Europeans buried it. In 1933, an almost identical statue was found, but with a skirt of hearts instead of snakes. The Statue of Coatlicue is now at the National Museum of Archaeology in Mexico City.

Hans Holbein the YoungerThe Ambassadors (1533) National Gallery, London

   
Ostensibly a double portrait of two French diplomats, most likely Jean de Dinteville, a landowner (left), and Georges de Selve, the Bishop of Lavaur (right), German painter Hans Holbein’s The Ambassadors contains many mysteries. The table between the two men, in the center of the composition, contains numerous symbols of religion and science or commerce, including two globes, a quadrant, a torquetum, a polyhedral sundial, an Oriental carpet, a Lutheran hymn book, and a lute with a broken string (a symbol of discord) (see second image). A half-hidden crucifix hangs in the upper left and the floor tiles bear a pattern that English viewers would have recognized from Westminster Abbey. (Holbein spent much of his working life in England, where The Ambassadors was painted.) Most bizarre is an anamorphically-rendered skull in the bottom center, which can only be seen properly if the painting is approached from the side (see second image above). The skull represents death and mortality, which lurk unrecognized in our midst, but it may also be an example of Holbein showing off his grasp of technique. The entire ensemble raises more questions than it answers, but appears to ask the viewer to enter into a debate about the interaction between science and religion, between the concerns of the rising scientific and merchant class and those of the clergy – are they in conflict or can they coexist? The Ambassadors is now in the National Gallery in London.

Parmigianino (Girolamo Francesco Maria Mazzola): Madonna of the Long Neck (1535)  Uffizi Gallery, Florence
Parmigianino_-_Madonna_with the long neck
Originally titled Madonna and Child with Angels and St. Jerome, Parmigianino’s Mannerist masterpiece soon acquired the nickname Madonna of the Long Neck for the extra vertebrae he added to Mary to give her neck a swanlike undulation. Elongated figures such as Mary’s are a hallmark of Mannerist art, which rejected the naturalism of the High Renaissance in favor of taking Renaissance trends to their logical conclusion, even if that meant a tribute became a critique. Here, for example, the artist’s commission required a portrait of St. Jerome. The result (in a portion of the piece Parmigianino’s did not finish due to his untimely death) is a (intentional or unintentional) parody of perspective, with a distant Jerome looking tinier than the gigantic Pieta-posed Christ child (who somehow stays balanced on Mary’s double wide lap). Because Jerome needs the right side, Parmigianino crams all the angels into the left, ignoring symmetry, while eroticizing them in ways that must have scandalized (or perhaps titillated) contemporaries. Measuring 7 ft. tall by 4.3 ft. wide and painted with oils on wood panel, the Madonna was commissioned by Italian noblewoman Elena Bacardi for her family chapel in a Parma church.  Madonna of the Long Neck is now in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence.

Paolo Veronese (Paolo Caliari): The Wedding at Cana (The Wedding Feast at Cana) (1562–1563) Musée du Louvre, Paris
wedding at cana   veronese wedding at cana detail   WeddingFeastDetail_Jesus
Measuring 22 ft. tall by 32.5 ft. wide and weighing 1.5 tons, The Wedding Feast at Cana (also known as The Wedding at Cana) is the largest painting in the Louvre (see first image, above).  Veronese received a commission from the Benedictine Monastery of San Giorgio Maggiore in Venice to paint the Gospel story in which Jesus changed water into wine. Veronese painted the work in the Mannerist style of the late Renaissance. Veronese combines ancient and contemporary details; some of the 130 guests are intended to represent current religious and political figures such as King Francis of France, Queen Mary of England, Emperor Charles V and Ottoman leader Suleiman the Magnificent (see second image above, with Suleiman in rear, wearing gold and turning to his right). Presumably because the Benedictine monks took a vow of silence, no one in the painting is speaking. The only guest looking directly at the viewer is Jesus, who sits at the center (see third image above). The painting hung in Venice from 1563 to 1797, when Napoleon looted it and brought it to Paris. The Louvre began restoring the painting in 1989, but two mishaps occurred in 1992 – a leaking air vent spattered the canvas with water, and then a support collapsed and the metal framework tore five holes in the canvas. The restored Wedding Feast at Cana remains in the Louvre in Paris. 

Giambologna (Jean Boulogne): The Rape of the Sabine Women (1581-1583) Loggia dei Lanzi, Piazza della Signora, Florence
Giambologna_sabine   giambolgona rape-of-the-sabine-women
Born Jean de Boulogne in Flanders, Giambologna acquired his professional name after he moved to Italy in 1550.  In 1581, his patrons the Medicis provided him with a large block of marble, from which he sculpted three nude figures in vertical composition as a showcase of his talent, without a prescribed subject. It was only after the sculpture was complete and Francesco I de’ Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, decreed that it be put on public display in the Loggia dei Lanzi in Florence’s Piazza della Signoria that the subject was declared to be The Rape of the Sabine Women, referring to the story from Ancient Roman history in which the Romans solve their disputes with the neighboring Sabine tribe by forcibly abducting their young women and marrying them, thus creating blood ties between the groups. The Rape of the Sabine Women (also known as Rape of a Sabine) stands 13.4 ft. tall and presents no obvious front view; the viewer must look at all sides (see two views in first and second images, above) to appreciate the complex composition. At the peak, a young woman struggles to escape from her powerful young abductor, while below them, an older man crouches in fear. The piece is an exemplar of the Mannerist style with its twisting figures and dynamic diagonals. The statue joined other famous sculptures in the Loggia dei Lanzi, including Benvenuto Cellini’s Perseus with the Head of Medusa.

Rembrandt (Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn): The Night Watch (1642)
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
Rembrandt_-_The_Nightwatch 2
lundens night watch copy
The painting by Dutch Golden Age artist Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn commonly known as The Night Watch does not depict a watch (which only occurs in times of danger) and does not take place at night. The members of a local militia commissioned Rembrandt to paint their portrait as they marched from their headquarters, during the day, in formation. The painting’s unwieldy original title is The Shooting Company of Frans Banning Cocq and Lieutenant Willem van Ruytenburch Preparing to March Out, but is now officially known as either Militia Company of District II under the Command of Captain Frans Banninck Cocq or The Shooting Company of Frans Banning Cocq and Willem van Ruytenburch. . The work demonstrates Rembrandt’s signature expertise in employing the technique of tenebrism, using dramatic lighting to draw the viewer’s attention to certain elements of the composition, while keeping the rest in shadow or complete darkness. The viewer focuses on the two leaders of the militia and a young girl, who carries the traditional symbols of the militia company. This large oil-on-canvas work (measuring 11.9 ft. tall by 14.3 ft. wide) has suffered numerous indignities through the years. First, the glazes Rembrandt used have darkened over the centuries, causing the loss of some details, especially in areas outside the brightly-lit focal points. Second, when The Night Watch was moved to Amsterdam Town Hall in 1715, the canvas was trimmed on all four sides so it could fit on the wall between two columns. The trimming cut off portions of figures on the right and eliminated two figures on the left, changing the balance of Rembrandt’s composition. (A 17th Century copy of the untrimmed work by Gerrit Lundens is shown in the second image above.) Finally, vandals have damaged the painting on three separate occasions (in 1911, 1975 and 1991), although restoration work has repaired most of the damage.  The Night Watch is now in the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam.

Joseph Wright of DerbyAn Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump (1767–1768)
National Gallery, London
An_Experiment_on_a_Bird_in_an_Air_Pump_by_Joseph_Wright_of_Derby 2
Like many of his time, English artist Joseph Wright of Derby was fascinated with science and progress; he wanted to use his art to celebrate the intellectual advancement of mankind in the 18th Century. In particular, he wanted to invest painted scenes of scientific discovery with the same reverence accorded to historical and religious scenes. An Experiment on a Bird in an Air Pump depicts a man – possibly an itinerant lecturer in natural philosophy – recreating Joseph Boyle’s 1659 vacuum (or air) pump experiment, in which air is removed from a container for a group of spectators. To demonstrate the vacuum, a bird is placed in the container – when all the air is removed, the bird dies. (The idea that a rare and expensive cockatoo, as shown here, would be used in the experiment is probably a bit of poetic license on Wright’s part.)  Although some of the spectators express concern about the bird, most of them seem in awe of the scientific discovery, thus supporting Wright’s beliefs about the importance of science. An Experiment on a Bird in an Air Pump was one of a number of candelit scenes that Wright painted in the 1760s. He excelled at painting the dramatic chiaroscuro effects resulting from the unusual and challenging lighting choice. An Experiment on a Bird in an Air Pump, which was made with oils on a canvas measuring 6 ft. tall by 7.87 ft. wide, is now in the National Gallery in London.

Jacques-Louis DavidOath of the Horatii (1784-1785) Musée du Louvre, Paris
Oath_of_the_HoratiiJacques-Louis David’s The Oath of the Horatii, measuring 4.27 ft. tall by 5.47 ft. wide, is considered a paragon of the Neoclassical style. According to a legend, a dispute between Rome and the city of Alba Longa was resolved by a ritual duel by three brothers of the Roman family the Horatii and three brothers of the Curiatii family of Alba Longa. David chose to paint an imagined moment when the Horatii brothers salute their father, who holds their swords, while their mother and siblings weep in sorrow. In keeping with the Neoclassical style, the background is deemphasized in favor of the foreground figures; there is a central perspectival vanishing point (at the point where the father holds the swords); the painter’s technique is not emphasized; no brushstrokes are visible; and straight lines and symmetry (here, groups of three) abound. The political symbolism – the duty of citizens to support their nation, even to the death – could not have been lost on those who viewed the painting at the Paris Salon in 1785, just four years before the Revolution erupted.  The Oath of the Horatii is now in the Louvre in Paris.

John ConstableThe Hay Wain (1821) National Gallery, London
Constable_The_Hay_Wain 2
Constable_hay wain
When British painter John Constable presented a landscape entitled Landscape: Noon at the 1821 Royal Academy summer exhibition, it barely caused a stir.  Constable, who grew up in the Suffolk countryside and had detailed personal knowledge of the English landscape and the implements of agriculture, painted with a realism that apparently offended those who preferred the idealized landscapes of Claude Lorraine and his school. Three years later, Constable renamed the painting The Hay Wain and exhibited it at the 1824 Paris Salon (see first image above). Here in France (home of Claude Lorrain), the work’s true beauty was recognized, and Charles X awarded The Hay Wain the exhibition’s Gold Medal. In the painting, Constable depicts a large farm cart, or hay wain, crossing the River Stour, which forms the border between Suffolk and Essex counties (see detail in second image above). Although on the one hand, Constable is presenting a picturesque scene of his beloved English countryside, there are other themes: the effect of the Industrial Revolution on the agrarian lifestyle; finding one’s purpose through working with the land; the idea of England as as earthly paradise. As was his practice, Constable made a full-sized oil sketch of the scene on site (the sketch is now in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London), and then returned to his London studio to paint the final work.  The farmer’s cottage at left still stands, although most of the trees are gone, and the spot is now a tourist attraction.  The Hay Wain, made with oils on a canvas measuring 4.3 ft. high by 6.1 ft. wide, is now in the National Gallery in London.

Eugène Delacroix (Ferdinand Victor Eugène Delacroix): Death of Sardanapalus (1827)
Musée du Louvre, Paris
Delacroix_-_The_Death_of_Sardanapalus
In Lord Byron’s telling, Sardanapalus, the last king of Assyria, was at war with the Medes, when he realized that he was facing imminent military defeat. To avoid the humiliation of capture or death at the hands of his foe, Sardanapalus decided to commit suicide by immolation. First, however, he ordered the destruction of all his worldly possessions, including the murder of his many slaves and concubines. French artist Eugène Delacroix’s Death of Sardanapalus depicts the chaotic scene in Sardanapalus’s lush private chambers, as his orders are carried out. While the canvas is full of activity, two of the concubines stand out: one, in the lower right, is being stabbed in the chest by a bearded man in a turban; another, almost in the center, splays her nude upper body on the king’s bed in a last desperate plea for mercy. Sardanapalus, reclining near the top of the canvas in shadow, is nonplussed, his mind made up – he only watches and waits for his turn. Delacroix’s large canvas (measuring 12.1 ft. high by 16.2 ft. wide) is a Romantic feast for the eyes. Full of bold, vivid colors, exotic clothing and decoration (including the elephant heads at the foot of the bed), the painting is essentially tragic. To ensure the emotional reaction he seeks, Delacroix deliberately disorients the viewer: the only visible architecture is the wall on the right – there are no floors or ceilings to anchor us in a solid space. The composition, while carefully organized, has no clear symmetry and seems to pull in many directions at once; the lines of perspective too, are difficult to discern. The unsettling feeling induced in the viewer by the subject matter and the technique contrasts strongly with the numb, silent, motionless and emotionless figure who set all this chaos in motion, Sardanapalus. At first glance, Death of Sardanapalus appears to depict the death of everyone but the titular king. But maybe Delacroix’s title is telling us that, in a way, Sardanapalus is already dead. Delacroix’s Death of Sardanapalus, made with oils on canvas, is now at the Louvre in Paris.

Édouard Manet: Le Déjeuner sur l’Herbe (Luncheon on the Grass(1863)
Musée d’Orsay, Paris
dejeuner l'herbeOriginally titled La Bain (The Bath), Édouard Manet’s Le Dejeuner sur l’herbe (Luncheon in the Grass) was considered obscene by many contemporaries. The 1863 Paris Salon rejected the painting, so Manet exhibited the large canvas at the Salon des Refusés. Manet borrowed the grouping from the lower right side of Marcantonio Raimondi’s engraving of Raphael’s drawing The Judgment of Paris and there is precedent for a group of two men in modern clothing and two nude women in Titian’s The Pastoral Concert. Multiple light sources, the out-of-proportion bather and other oddities have spawned multiple explanations. Some scholars have theorized that the figures are not outdoors but in the artist’s studio. The website everypainterpaintshimself.com goes further, positing that the bathing woman is not a three-dimensional figure but a painted canvas and that the nude woman boldly gazing at us is the model. Manet’s painting, which was made with oils on a canvas measuring 6.8 ft. high by 8.7 ft. wide, is now in the Musée d’Orsay in Paris.

Édouard ManetOlympia (1863) Musée d’Orsay, Paris
manet olympia
French artist Édouard Manet shocked the crowds at the 1865 Paris Salon with his sensational portrait of a well-to-do courtesan (Olympia was a common name for prostitutes in Manet’s Paris) in a classical pose that seems to mock Titian’s Venus of Urbino (1538). Because Manet refused to idealize the nude figure and instead personalized her as a woman of the world boldly confronting us with her gaze, he forces the viewer to confront her raw sexuality, and not some high-minded allegory of Beauty. His style, too, rejects the illusions of Renaissance and Classical art and instead begins to hint that a painting is two dimensional – a very modernist notion – by reducing modeling and flattening some of the three-dimensionality of the figures. Olympia was made with oil paints on a canvas measuring 4.3 ft. tall by 6.2 ft. wide. It is now in the Musée d’Orsay in Paris.

Pierre-Auguste RenoirLuncheon of the Boating Party (1880-1881)
The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC
Luncheon_of_the_Boating_Party 2
French Impressionist painter Pierre-Auguste Renoir often painted his friends into his artworks, and The Luncheon of the Boating Party is no exception. For example, (1) the woman playing with the dog is Aline Charigot, who would later become Renoir’s wife; (2) the woman at the center drinking from a glass is actress Ellen Andrée (from L’Absinthe); and (3) the man in the straw hat on the right is painter Gustave Caillebotte. The setting for the luncheon is the balcony of the Maison Fournaise along the Seine in Chatou, France. Critics have praised Renoir’s treatment of light, which enters from the area between the two figures leaning on the railing and then reflects off the white shirts and tablecloth to fill the composition, leaving no room for darkness or gloom. The Luncheon of the Boating Party, made with oil paints on a canvas measuring 4.25 ft. tall and 5.67 ft. wide, is now at The Phillips Collection in Washington, D.C.

Marcel DuchampNude Descending a Staircase #2 (1912) Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Duchamp_-_Nude_Descending_a_Staircase    muybridge nude descending a staircase
The invention of photography gave scientists and artists like Eadweard Muybridge and Etienne Jules-Marey a new way to study the movement of humans and other animals, dissecting their actions into fragments of a second to reveal what could not be seen otherwise (see Muybridge’s study in the second image above).  It is likely that French Modernist Marcel Duchamp was inspired by photographs of this sort, as well as by the the Cubists and the Italian Futurists, when he painted Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (see first image above). Unfortunately, perhaps because Duchamp’s work did not fit neatly into preexisting categories, he found rejection on all sides. The Cubists at the 1912 Paris Salon des Indépendants rejected the painting because it was “too Futurist” and because they felt that painting a nude descending the stairs was “ridiculous.” When Duchamp exhibited the painting at the 1913 Armory Show in New York, the criticism was cacophonous, with one critic calling it “an explosion in a shingle factory.” An art magazine held a contest to ‘find the nude’, and even Teddy Roosevelt registered his disgust. In fact, the painting is very much within the Cubist tradition, with its monochrome palette and deconstruction of forms. What sets the piece apart is the addition of the element of movement. Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, made with oils on a canvas measuring 4.8 ft. tall by 2.9 ft. wide, is now at the Philadelphia Museum of Art in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

For Best Works of Art of All Time – The Critics’ Picks, Part 2, click HERE.

2 thoughts on “Best Works of Art of All Time – The Critics’ Picks, Part 1

  1. Pingback: Today Is the First Frame of the Rest of Your Life: The Art Lists Redux | Make Lists, Not War

  2. fordfan96

    Hello,

    These lists are very interesting. Can you tell me what the 18 lists that were used are? Same with the TV show, literature, poetry, and classical music lists?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s